2004
DOI: 10.1093/sp/jxh026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transnational Advocacy Networks and Policy Cycles in the European Union: The Case of Sexual Harassment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
53
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Terms like a 'boomerang effect' (Keck and Sikkink 1998), a 'ping-pong effect' (Zippel 2004), and 'dual strategy' (Kohler-Koch 1997) have been used to identify such multilevel strategies. Della Porta and Caiani (2009) use the notion of 'crossed influence' as they argue that current protest activities entail both an element of 'domestication of protest' as social movements continue to approach national governments but with a European 71 agenda and 'externalisation of protest' as domestic actors mobilise at the EU level in an attempt to put pressure on national governments.…”
Section: Routes and Organisational Factors -Taking Stock Of Existingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Terms like a 'boomerang effect' (Keck and Sikkink 1998), a 'ping-pong effect' (Zippel 2004), and 'dual strategy' (Kohler-Koch 1997) have been used to identify such multilevel strategies. Della Porta and Caiani (2009) use the notion of 'crossed influence' as they argue that current protest activities entail both an element of 'domestication of protest' as social movements continue to approach national governments but with a European 71 agenda and 'externalisation of protest' as domestic actors mobilise at the EU level in an attempt to put pressure on national governments.…”
Section: Routes and Organisational Factors -Taking Stock Of Existingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the EES provides a forum through which policymakers are exposed to thought-provoking new ideas about common problems, which they can utilise in their respective national reform eff orts. Th e same interviewee, who is also a member of EMCO, used the apt analogy of a "ping-pong game" to describe how ideas travel from national capitals to Brussels, bounce back to the national capital, and then back again to Brussels and so on (for a similar assessment, see Zippel 2004). Over time, Member States and the Commission take on just a little bit of the others' ideas, and eventually "one can trace ideational changes in party manifestos, as grounds for justifi cation for new legislation, in cabinet resolutions and the like" (interview, BMAS2, my translation).…”
Section: Vi1 Normative/cognitive Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this legislation varies considerably among countries in terms of how it is stated and enforced (Sigal et al 2005). Generally, it has been argued that apart from this legislation, most national governments have remained unresponsive to the issue of SH while in some countries (e.g., the UK) no statutory definition of SH yet exists (Samuels 2004;Zippel 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%