Sexual harassment (SH) includes men as harassers and women as victims. It is defined in many Western countries as a criminal offense. However, the social response to SH may be characterized by clear leniency toward harassers. The present study investigated the roots of such response. Respondents from a large, representative, random, Israeli sample (630) were asked to evaluate hypothetical short crime scenarios, constructed by the factorial-survey approach, representing cases of sexual harassment and other offenses. The study hypothesized that respondents' perceptions of SH scenarios will be affected significantly by their gender-role attitudes to women. The findings indicate that such criminal acts are perceived as serious by the whole public, challenging the consensual basis of the lenient approach to harassers.
Keywords Sexual harrassment . Seriousness perceptions . IsraelAlthough crime seriousness studies have consistently shown that the public at large perceives sexual offenses as serious offenses, it is not yet clear whether the lay public shares the belief that sexual harassment (henceforth SH) should be considered a criminal offense at all and, if so, whether it is more, equally, or less serious than other unlawful acts. Pursuant to the consensus model of the criminal law, the goal of this study was to assess public perceptions regarding the seriousness of SH and to compare these perceptions with the perceived seriousness of other typical criminal offenses. In this way the present study attempted to examine empirically whether the recent inclusion of this offense in the Israeli law corresponds to the criteria applied by the Israeli public in assessing the seriousness of SH cases. To this end, Israeli respondents were asked to evaluate subjectively the seriousness of, and also to suggest the most appropriate penal measure, for a collection of hypothetical, concrete crime scenarios, entailing both SH, and many other types of offenses. Operationally, unlike other studies conducted on SH in Israel (see Rimalt 2005;Zeira et al. 2002), the research goal of the present study was to assess empirically whether significant differences in the seriousness scores and punishment options assigned to the scenarios would be found between SH and several other forms of offenses.In this study the factorial-design methodology was applied. This technique uses multidimensional hypothetical scenarios presented in a form that combines the benefits of controlled, randomized experimental designs and conventional surveys (see Rossi and Anderson 1982). By this technique, the scenarios used here were created (before the survey was conducted) by randomly selecting values (levels) from each of several variables (dimensions; one level per dimension per scenario) until each dimension was represented and a complete scenario was formed (for details of this study's dimensions and values, see Appendix 1). Although ideally we would have liked to gather as much information as possible from each respondent, the decisions regarding the number of v...