2006
DOI: 10.1525/an.2006.47.9.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transnational Migration and Diaspora Studies: Innovations in Ethnography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to the latter, comparisons are made to previous research undertaken in their regions of origin, so that the study takes on a multi-site dimension commonly used in contemporary migration studies (Kenny, 2006). The present study thus represents a rupture with classical ethnography, which assumes cultural and sub-cultural homogeneity.…”
Section: Enchanted (And Disenchanted) Amazonia 111mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the latter, comparisons are made to previous research undertaken in their regions of origin, so that the study takes on a multi-site dimension commonly used in contemporary migration studies (Kenny, 2006). The present study thus represents a rupture with classical ethnography, which assumes cultural and sub-cultural homogeneity.…”
Section: Enchanted (And Disenchanted) Amazonia 111mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marcus (1995) offered an interesting way out of this dilemma through trans-disciplinary, multi-sited ethnography, which would work through space, following people or cultural processes without necessarily diminishing fieldwork competencies and losing sight of 'subaltern' subjects. Since 1995 this strategy has become the norm and has obvious advantages in research on contemporary subjects such as migration studies (Kenny, 2006), so giving anthropology a tremendous push toward studying 'globalization'. However, 'iconically identifying a cultural phenomenon in one site that is reproduced elsewhere' (Marcus, 1995: 111, my emphasis) does not tackle the problem of spatial differentiation and cultural complexity, which leads different ethnographers working in the same general area at the same scale of analysis to disagree about the empirical veracity of their observations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%