2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2015.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transparent three-phase Byzantine fault tolerance for parallel and distributed simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A slightly different approach is proposed in [26]. In which, the authors introduce the Fault Tolerant Recently, in [27] the authors proposed a transparent middleware for dealing with Byzantine fault in HLAbased parallel and distributed simulations. In this case, the solution is based on the usage of replication, checkpointing and message logging technologies.…”
Section: Checkpointingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A slightly different approach is proposed in [26]. In which, the authors introduce the Fault Tolerant Recently, in [27] the authors proposed a transparent middleware for dealing with Byzantine fault in HLAbased parallel and distributed simulations. In this case, the solution is based on the usage of replication, checkpointing and message logging technologies.…”
Section: Checkpointingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a distributed system, reaching agreement is a fundamental problem because all nodes decide on a common outcome. The system requires that the nodes exchange information to negotiate with one another and eventually reach a common agreement before taking application-specific actions [30]. A blockchain is a distributed database system, wherein the nodes collectively decide whether to commit or abort a block in which they participate.…”
Section: Consensus Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%