2015
DOI: 10.1080/15427528.2015.1071299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transpiration Efficiency of Grain Sorghum and Maize under Different Planting Geometries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a greenhouse study consisting of ESP, clump, and cluster geometries, Reddy et al. (2015) found significantly different HIs of 0.48, 0.55, and 0.50, respectively, in grain sorghum and statistically similar HIs in corn. Simons, Tan, Belfield, and Martin (2008) found higher HIs in corn plants grown in skip‐rows than in ESPs.…”
Section: Benefits Of Alternative Planting Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a greenhouse study consisting of ESP, clump, and cluster geometries, Reddy et al. (2015) found significantly different HIs of 0.48, 0.55, and 0.50, respectively, in grain sorghum and statistically similar HIs in corn. Simons, Tan, Belfield, and Martin (2008) found higher HIs in corn plants grown in skip‐rows than in ESPs.…”
Section: Benefits Of Alternative Planting Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mohammed, Blaser, and Stewart (2012) found that corn grain yields were not significantly higher for clump plantings than for ESPs, but individual kernel mass was increased in clump plantings. Reddy, Angira, Blaser, and Stewart (2015) evaluated three planting geometries—clump (3 plants clump −1 ), cluster (6 plants cluster −1 ), and ESP in corn and sorghum—in a greenhouse at Canyon, TX. The effect of planting geometry on transpiration efficiency and grain yield was not statistically significant, but there was a general trend that the clump and cluster geometries had greater transpiration efficiency and grain yield.…”
Section: Benefits Of Alternative Planting Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This planting geometry research expanded into greenhouse and field studies, including producer's fields, primarily focused on grain sorghum and corn (Zea mays L.), although other grain crops were also tested. Transpiration efficiency, canopy temperature, humidity, root growth, and other physiological factors were evaluated in these studies (Bandaru et al, 2006;Reddy, Angira, Blaser, & Stewart, 2015;Thapa et al, 2018) where the majority of the results suggested the clump geometries consistently provided improved microclimates and crop yields were similar or greater than the control (equally spaced plants). Figure 1, adapted from Thapa et al (2018), diagrams some of the planting geometries that were tested.…”
Section: Research From the Institutementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research ranged from field-oriented basic research on crop root growth and water uptake (Xue et al, 2003) to studies of planting geometry effects on crop yield and water productivity (Bandaru et al, 2006;Stewart, 2009). In a series of field and greenhouse experiments, Stewart's students showed the effects of various planting geometries on tillering, microclimate, yield, transpiration efficiency (Reddy, Angira, Blaser, & Stewart, 2015), and water productivity of maize (Kapanigowda, Stewart, Howell, Kadasrivenkata, & Baumhardt, 2010a;Mohammed, Blaser, & Stewart, 2012;Thapa et al, 2016) and sorghum (Kapanigowda, Schneider, & Stewart, 2010b;Krishnareddy, Stewart, Payne, & Robinson, 2009;Thapa, Stewart, Xue, & Chen, 2017a, 2017b) . Stewart's long experience with Great Plains agriculture and the soil and water conservation research and applications necessary to sustain it was encapsulated in his 2010 publication on major advances in soil and water conservation in the U.S. SHP (Stewart, Baumhardt, & Evett, 2010).…”
Section: Long-range Soil and Water Conservation -And Direction Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%