2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1012715626037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transport-Dissipation Analytical Solutions to the E-∈Turbulence Model and their Role in Predictions of the Neutral ABL

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…250 N. Afzal Coleman (1999), Shingai and Kawamura (2004) and laboratory data of Caldwell et al (1972); b the matching derivative function χ∂u + /∂χ versus χ for the mesolayer variables from DNS data of Spalart et al (2008) The geostrophic drag and cross-isobaric angle data tabulated in Tables I-IV of Hess and Garratt (2002) from many sources, laboratory data of Caldwell et al (1972) and Howroyd and Slawson (1975), DNS data of Spalart et al (2008); Shingai and Kawamura (2004); Coleman (1999); Coleman et al (1990) and Lin et al (1997) and predictions by E-e model of Freedman and Jacobson (2002) are considered. The geostrophic velocity component U g /u * Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…250 N. Afzal Coleman (1999), Shingai and Kawamura (2004) and laboratory data of Caldwell et al (1972); b the matching derivative function χ∂u + /∂χ versus χ for the mesolayer variables from DNS data of Spalart et al (2008) The geostrophic drag and cross-isobaric angle data tabulated in Tables I-IV of Hess and Garratt (2002) from many sources, laboratory data of Caldwell et al (1972) and Howroyd and Slawson (1975), DNS data of Spalart et al (2008); Shingai and Kawamura (2004); Coleman (1999); Coleman et al (1990) and Lin et al (1997) and predictions by E-e model of Freedman and Jacobson (2002) are considered. The geostrophic velocity component U g /u * Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geostrophic-drag predictions have been analysed from extensive data from many sources: the laboratory data of Caldwell et al (1972) and Howard and Slawson (1975); the DNS data of Shingai and Kawamura (2004), Coleman (1999), Coleman et al (2005), Coleman et al (1990) and Lin et al (1997); and the turbulence model of Freedman and Jacobson (2002): see Hess and Garratt (2002, tables I, II, IV). Figure 9(a) shows the components of the geostrophic drag U g /u * plotted against the Rossby number Ro * , from the above data, on a semi-log plot.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predicted turbulent length scale distributions as a function of distance from the ground, for the Cabauw (G ¼ 10 m s À1 ) neutral Ekman-layer data, see Van Ulden and Wieringa (1996). Recently, Freedman and Jacobson (2002) have derived analytical solutions of the coupled k and e equations for the case of steady balance between transport and dissipation terms, which is the dominant balance just below the boundary-layer top. They have provided analytical conditions for the point where the turbulent length scale profiles made a transition from decreasing to increasing values with height.…”
Section: Fully-developed Channel Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many efforts have been made since then to remove the mentioned deficiency of the standard k-e model; see Detering and Etling (1985), Duynkerke (1988), Andren (1991), Andren and Moeng (1993), Apsley and Castro (1997), Xu and Taylor (1997) and Freedman and Jacobson (2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%