1994
DOI: 10.1016/0301-4215(94)90007-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transport energy in Australia Policy problems, issues and alternatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[16][17][18] Most notably, the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution in its 18th report 4 expressed the view that there would be environmental advantages in the use of natural gas, as opposed to diesel, in relatively large vehicles that make frequent stops in urban areas. UK Field trials and analysis have also identified numerous environmental and other advantages of NGVs.…”
Section: Natural Gas As An Alternative Fuelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18] Most notably, the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution in its 18th report 4 expressed the view that there would be environmental advantages in the use of natural gas, as opposed to diesel, in relatively large vehicles that make frequent stops in urban areas. UK Field trials and analysis have also identified numerous environmental and other advantages of NGVs.…”
Section: Natural Gas As An Alternative Fuelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, experiencing tangible results in a short period is unlikely, as the new policy revealed critical problems during its implementation process. Energy experts raised concerns regarding the miscalculation of socio‐economic costs considering Korea's particularities (Cho, 2019, 2020), including the expansion of natural gas, which like coal does not fit into clean energy (Moon, 2019), and would weaken Korea's energy security (Lee, 2017). Moreover, as examined later, issues were raised, including: one‐off public debate, controversy over the fairness of the committees, realization of experts' concerns about the policy's side‐effects, aggravation of social conflicts over policy content, lack of sufficient transparent information, and the government's authenticity for participatory democracy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%