Transportation Energy Futures Series. Vehicle Technology Deployment Pathways. An Examination of Timing and Investment Constraints

Abstract

This is one of a series of reports produced as a result of the Transportation Energy Futures (TEF) project, a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)-sponsored multi-agency project initiated to identify underexplored strategies for abating greenhouse gases and reducing petroleum dependence related to transportation. The project was designed to consolidate existing transportation energy knowledge, advance analytic capacity-building, and uncover opportunities for sound strategic action.Transportation currently accounts for 71% of total U.S. petroleum use and 33% of the nation's total carbon emissions. The TEF project explores how combining multiple strategies could reduce GHG emissions and petroleum use by 80%. Researchers examined four key areas -lightduty vehicles, non-light-duty vehicles, fuels, and transportation demand -in the context of the marketplace, consumer behavior, industry capabilities, technology and the energy and transportation infrastructure. The TEF reports support DOE long-term planning. The reports provide analysis to inform decisions about transportation energy research investments, as well as the role of advanced transportation energy technologies and systems in the development of new physical, strategic, and policy alternatives.In addition to the DOE and its Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, TEF benefitted from the collaboration of experts from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory and Argonne National Laboratory, along with steering committee members from the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Transportation, academic institutions and industry associations. More detail on the project, as well as the full series of reports, can be found at http://www.eere.energy.gov/analysis/transportationenergyfutures. Contract EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Scenarios May Need Reality Checks on Timing and InvestmentsAnalysts may develop scenarios of the deployment of new vehicle technologies for a variety of reasons, ranging from pure thought exercises for hypothesizing about the future, to careful examinations of the possible outcomes of future policies or trends in technology, to examination of the feasibility of broad goals of reducing greenhouse gases and/or oil use. To establish a scenario's plausibility, analysts will seek to make their underlying assumptions clear and to "reality check" the story they tell about technology development and deployment in the marketplace.This report examines two aspects of "reality checking"-(1) whether the timing of the vehicle deployment envisioned by the scenarios corresponds to recognized limits to technology development and market penetration and (2) whether the investments that must be made for the scenario to unfold seem viable from the perspective of the investment community. There are some excellent examples of scenario development that have taken a considerable effort to account for timing issues-the Massachusetts Institute of Technology report On the Road in 2035 (Bandivadekar et al. 2008) is one such example. However, a review of the litera...

How to decarbonize the transport sector?

“…To properly study such (timing) effects, models dedicated to the transport sector should be employed (cf. the 'reality check' study on timing and investments for the introduction of innovative light-duty vehicles by Plotkin et al, 2013). Fig.…”

Energy Impacts of Wide Band Gap Semiconductors in U.S. Light-Duty Electric Vehicle Fleet

“…34 These parameters were chosen to be consistent with adoption rates that have been observed for other vehicle technologies reported in EPA 35 and summarized in a Transportation Energy Futures report. 36 The parameters p = 0.007 and q = 0.34 provide a reasonable fit to these data, as illustrated in Figure S3.…”

Compact potential of exhaust heat exchangers for engine waste heat recovery using metal foams

“…Presently, the average brake thermal efficiency of internal combustion engines (ICEs) remains at 30% to 40% because the residual energy generated by fuel combustion is wasted by the exhaust, jacket water, and so on . Among various energy‐saving technologies of ICEs, the waste heat recovery (WHR) system has the greatest potential in terms of efficiency improvement and energy‐saving according to the Argonne National Laboratory report, published in 2013 . Therefore, scholars have tried many ways to recover the waste heat of engines.…”