2019
DOI: 10.1002/jum.15018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transvaginal Real‐time Shear Wave Elastography in the Diagnosis of Cervical Disease

Abstract: Objectives-To explore the value of shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of cervical disease.Methods-This work was a retrospective analysis of 246 cases of cervical lesions confirmed by transvaginal conventional ultrasound, shear wave elastography, and a cytologic test. The lesions were divided into 2 groups according to the final pathologic results: a malignant cervical group and a benign cervical group. In addition, the normal cervix was set as the control group.Results-The maximum and mean shear wave vel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the obtained mean SWE values were similar to those in the literature [12][13][14][15]. The elasticity values were higher in the internal and posterior regions than in the external and anterior regions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, the obtained mean SWE values were similar to those in the literature [12][13][14][15]. The elasticity values were higher in the internal and posterior regions than in the external and anterior regions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…SWE has been used mostly for assessing cervical insufficiency, premature delivery, and post-term pregnancy [8][9][10][11] in the gynaecological era. Recently, it has also been used for cervical tissue characterisation and the differentiation of benign and malignant cervical tumours [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, there were six studies including 615 patients with 415 cancers and 200 benign lesions that were finalized to be performed by the systematic review for qualitative synthesis and quantitative analysis (meta‐analysis) (Figure 1). 15‐20 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was probably because only one trial using qualitative methods was included, 17 so we did not conclude that quantitative and semiquantitative methods were superior to qualitative ones. The difference between ARFI and SSI was not evaluated, because ARFI and SSI each had only one related study 15,19 . Above all, combined with statistical analysis, no heterogeneous sources were found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation