1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf01197546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trapping of positrons at vacancies in magnesium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
33
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of positron trapping at vacancies in Mg, the calculated positron lifetime increase is from 219 to 289 ps, whereas the much smaller increase from 225 to 255 ps has been measured between a well-annealed sample and a sample with thermally generated vacancies. 43 The calculated large lifetime increase is also reflected in a rather small W rel parameter of 0.56 for V Mg . However, the calculated positron trapping energy of 0.34 eV is in agreement with the estimate of 0.3-0.4 eV by Hautojärvi et al 43 One possible source of the theory-experiment disagreement could be difficulties in extracting bulk and vacancy lifetimes for Mg in measurements.…”
Section: Discussion and Comparison With Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of positron trapping at vacancies in Mg, the calculated positron lifetime increase is from 219 to 289 ps, whereas the much smaller increase from 225 to 255 ps has been measured between a well-annealed sample and a sample with thermally generated vacancies. 43 The calculated large lifetime increase is also reflected in a rather small W rel parameter of 0.56 for V Mg . However, the calculated positron trapping energy of 0.34 eV is in agreement with the estimate of 0.3-0.4 eV by Hautojärvi et al 43 One possible source of the theory-experiment disagreement could be difficulties in extracting bulk and vacancy lifetimes for Mg in measurements.…”
Section: Discussion and Comparison With Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…43 The calculated large lifetime increase is also reflected in a rather small W rel parameter of 0.56 for V Mg . However, the calculated positron trapping energy of 0.34 eV is in agreement with the estimate of 0.3-0.4 eV by Hautojärvi et al 43 One possible source of the theory-experiment disagreement could be difficulties in extracting bulk and vacancy lifetimes for Mg in measurements.…”
Section: Discussion and Comparison With Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This can be understood since positron studies by Hautojaervi et al 20 and Segers et al 19 using defect quenching and annealing of Mg samples demonstrated that Mg vacancies are highly mobile ͑the migration energy is ϳ0.5 eV͒, and a complete annealing of vacancies and small vacancy clusters occurs well below room temperature. Appreciable defect concentrations on the order of 10 −6 or higher are reached only at temperatures above about 700 K in thermodynamic equilibrium, 19,20 and positron trapping ͓the positron trapping energy is ϳ0.34 eV ͑Ref. 21͔͒ in these thermally generated vacancies was detected only at such high temperatures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Finally, the PALS studies showed that saturation trapping and annihilation in vacancy-related defects occurs inside the Mg areas of the Mg-Ti͑-H͒ films. POSWIN 21 The comparison with experimental and theoretical positron lifetimes for the monovacancy 22,23 and divacancy 21 in Mg strongly indicates that trapping occurs in divacancies. Clearly, the detected positron lifetime in the Mg 1−y Ti y metal phase scales proportional to the volume per metal atom 3,4 ͑Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%