This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the clinical efficacy of chemotherapy or endocrine therapy maintenance in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients.
Materials and MethodsThe meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and propensity score matching of multicentre cohort study evaluated MBC patients who underwent first-line chemotherapy or endocrine therapy maintenance. This study is registered with PROSPERO: CRD42017071858, and ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04258163.
ResultsA total of 2,867 patients from 15 RCTs and 760 patients from multicentre cohort were included.The results from meta-analysis showed that chemotherapy maintenance improved progressionfree survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-0.73; p < 0.010; moderate-quality evidence) and overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.87; 95% CI 0.78-0.97; p=0.016; high-quality evidence) than observation. In the cohort study, for hormone receptor (HR)positive MBC patients, chemotherapy maintenance improved PFS (HR, 0.67; 95% CI 0.52-0.85; p < 0.001) and OS (HR, 0.55; 95% CI 0.42-0.73; p < 0.001) compared with observation, and endocrine therapy maintenance also improved PFS (HR, 0.65; 95% CI 0.53-0.80; p < 0.001) and OS (HR, 0.55; 95% CI 0.44-0.69; p < 0.001). There were no differences between chemotherapy and endocrine therapy maintenance in PFS and OS (All p > 0.05). Regardless of the continuum or switch maintenance therapy, showed prolonged survival in MBC patients who were response to first-line treatment.
ConclusionThis study provided evidences for survival benefits of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy A c c e p t e d A r t i c l e CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT (CRT) 4