2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traumatic kidney injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are consistent with latest guidelines since hemodynamic stability is the main criterion for non-operative management of kidney trauma [ 27 31 ]. Angioembolization has a key role in the non-operative management, but no validated criteria to predict RAE efficacy are available in the current literature and its practice remains heterogeneous in blunt renal injuries [ 23 , 32 ]. We analysed contemporary published articles of patients undergoing RAE for blunt renal trauma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings are consistent with latest guidelines since hemodynamic stability is the main criterion for non-operative management of kidney trauma [ 27 31 ]. Angioembolization has a key role in the non-operative management, but no validated criteria to predict RAE efficacy are available in the current literature and its practice remains heterogeneous in blunt renal injuries [ 23 , 32 ]. We analysed contemporary published articles of patients undergoing RAE for blunt renal trauma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A partial nephrectomy may be necessary when the renal tissue is unviable. In the lack of possibility to preserve the renal tissue, total nephrectomy should be beneficial [7] , [8] . Moreover, nephrectomy is a primary treatment for malignant tumors [5] .…”
Section: Clinical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 1-3% of all trauma patients have renal injury (1,2). Eighty percent of renal trauma is due to blunt injury (1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adaptation of the AAST renal injury grading system, with an emphasis on CT findings. Prior studies have reported that approximately 28-32% of renal injuries are grade I, 16-26% grade II, 19-22% grade III, 18-25% grade IV, and 4-9% grade V(2,12) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%