2018
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.2550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traumatic Tympanic Membrane Perforations Diagnosed in Emergency Departments

Abstract: Traumatic TMP represents a common reason for evaluation in the ED. Despite common warnings regarding risk of injury to the tympanic membrane with use of a cotton-tipped applicator, it is still a major cause of traumatic TMPs. Other injury mechanisms also play an important role in the teenage and young adult populations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
29
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Mechanical Characterization: A macroindentation approach was developed for evaluating the mechanical response of the fabricated test cases. Inspired by the TM perforations caused by foreign body instrumentation, such as from cotton buds or other sharp objects, [20] a cylindrical stainless steel probe with a diameter of 2.5 mm was used to evaluate the stress-strain profile of the developed scaffolds until the point of rupture (Figure 5A). The outer perimeter of the fabricated scaffolds was sealed onto the rim of a hollow tube (inner diameter = 8 mm, outer diameter = 12 mm), using a double-sided tape (Van Loenen Instruments, the Netherlands).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mechanical Characterization: A macroindentation approach was developed for evaluating the mechanical response of the fabricated test cases. Inspired by the TM perforations caused by foreign body instrumentation, such as from cotton buds or other sharp objects, [20] a cylindrical stainless steel probe with a diameter of 2.5 mm was used to evaluate the stress-strain profile of the developed scaffolds until the point of rupture (Figure 5A). The outer perimeter of the fabricated scaffolds was sealed onto the rim of a hollow tube (inner diameter = 8 mm, outer diameter = 12 mm), using a double-sided tape (Van Loenen Instruments, the Netherlands).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D patterns chosen for this study were first analyzed computationally, following which the PEOT/PBT-based TM scaffolds were biofabricated and characterized with respect to their mechanical, acoustical, and biological response (Figure 1). A macroindentation approach, inspired from one of the leading causes of traumatic TM perforations -foreign body instrumentation, [20] was implemented to evaluate the mechanical contribution of the varying fiber arrangements, whereas, the acoustical characterization was conducted using LDV. Biological characterization of the fabricated scaffolds was performed with human dermal fibroblasts, neonatal (NHDFs), and human mesenchymal stromal cells (hM-SCs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aural foreign bodies in human beings are treated frequently in emergency settings, with visits reported to exceed 50 000 in one year 4. Cotton‐tipped applicators are the most common item removed from the ears of adults, while jewellery products are most common in young children 4 5. Reports of aural foreign bodies in dogs are far fewer, with the majority of cases caused by grass seeds 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A macro-indentation approach was developed for evaluating the mechanical response of the fabricated test cases. Inspired by the TM perforations caused by foreign body instrumentation, such as from cotton buds or other sharp objects [40], a cylindrical stainless steel probe with a diameter of 2.5 mm was used to evaluate the stress-strain profile of the developed scaffolds until the point of rupture ( Figure 4A ). The outer perimeter of the fabricated scaffolds were fixed onto the rim of a hollow tube (inner diameter = 8 mm, outer diameter = 12 mm), using a double-sided tape (Van Loenen Instruments, the Netherlands).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D patterns chosen for this study were first analyzed computationally, following which the PEOT/PBT based TM scaffolds were biofabricated and characterized with respect to their mechanical, acoustical and biological response. A macro-indentation approach, inspired from one of the leading causes of traumatic TM perforations – foreign body instrumentation [40], was implemented to evaluate the mechanical contribution of the varying fiber arrangements, whereas, the acoustical characterization was conducted using LDV. Biological characterization of the fabricated scaffolds were performed with human dermal fibroblasts (hDFs) and human mesenchymal stromal cells (hMSCs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%