2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2021.103137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Travel duration tolerance: Examining the sensitivity of emotional well-being to trip duration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using data from a retrospective survey among commuters following a workplace relocation, Ma et al (2021b) found that the amount of variation in commute time has a greater impact on commute satisfaction than the gap between the actual and ideal commute time. Relying on a smartphone-based survey, Ermagun et al (2022) examined the correlation between travel duration and emotional wellbeing. They found that bus, rail, and bike users withstand longer commute durations before their emotional wellbeing worsens, suggesting positive benefits of such travel modes.…”
Section: • New Methods In Travel Satisfaction Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using data from a retrospective survey among commuters following a workplace relocation, Ma et al (2021b) found that the amount of variation in commute time has a greater impact on commute satisfaction than the gap between the actual and ideal commute time. Relying on a smartphone-based survey, Ermagun et al (2022) examined the correlation between travel duration and emotional wellbeing. They found that bus, rail, and bike users withstand longer commute durations before their emotional wellbeing worsens, suggesting positive benefits of such travel modes.…”
Section: • New Methods In Travel Satisfaction Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Young [49] found that commuting satisfaction rose first and then decreased with the hypothetical commuting time (HCT). Subsequently, the relevant literature on the positive utility of an ideal commuting time and the negative utility of an acceptable (tolerable) commuting time emerged [50][51][52][53][54]. The ideal commuting time (ICT) reflects commuters' preferences for commuting times; people's ICTs are mainly around 10-20 min [55,56], while the tolerance threshold for commuting times (TTCT) reflects commuters' tolerance of commuting times; people's TTCTs was 30-40 min [57,58].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the ACT is close to the ICT, the perceived satisfaction of commuters is better [41,43,78]. While the TTCT reflects commuters' tolerance of commuting times [57,58], When the ACT approaches or even exceeds the TTCT, the negative motions of commuters significantly increase [54], which leads to a sharp satisfaction decrease [40,42]. In addition, the advantage of clustering respondents in this way is that it not only reflects the relationship between the actual commuting time and commuting satisfaction, but also helps to reveal the specific impact of respondents' subjective commuting-time boundary points on commuting satisfaction.…”
Section: Group Differences In the Nonlinear Relationships Between Com...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Public transport facilities can improve the attractiveness of urban parks, and increasing the number of bus stations can attract more residents to urban parks [41]. e convenience of travel also affects the attractiveness of urban parks, because the attractive radius of urban parks is mainly 1-3 km [42]. Residents living nearby are more convenient to travel to and are more likely to go to urban parks [43,44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%