2019
DOI: 10.1515/med-2019-0026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treating infertility: current affairs of cross-border reproductive care

Abstract: AbstractInfertility patients are willing to travel abroad to receive the medical treatment of choice. A 2010 study reported that approximately 25,000 couples travel abroad annually seeking infertility treatment. The purpose of this review is to analyze the criteria and risks related to cross-border reproductive care (CBRC) from the perspective of the patients and explore the issues raised regarding the country of origin and the destination country. A computerized search was per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On another note, the concept of delaying aging has been intensively promoted in media. This reality reinforces 120 . Staying true to their hippocratic oath "first do no harm" practitioners are invited to see beyond the hype and hope entailed in cutting-edge treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On another note, the concept of delaying aging has been intensively promoted in media. This reality reinforces 120 . Staying true to their hippocratic oath "first do no harm" practitioners are invited to see beyond the hype and hope entailed in cutting-edge treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…On another note, the concept of delaying aging has been intensively promoted in media. This reality reinforces 120 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some recipients resort to the emerging sector of cross-border reproductive services (CBRS) as a means of broadening the range of fertility options available to them, including the choice between anonymous and non-anonymous donations for their ART treatment ( Bergmann, 2011 ). The desire to use an anonymous donor is reported as one of the possible motivations influencing the decision to consider the use of CBRS ( Rodino et al, 2014 ; Hertz et al, 2016 ; Simopoulou et al, 2019 ). A rising online market facilitating contact between potential sperm donors and recipients in an informal setting beyond institutional and state regulations provides potential self-insemination recipients with opportunities to freely exercise and negotiate their preferences concerning donor (non-)anonymity, the extent of information on the donor, and the level of involvement with the donor, thus circumventing legal restrictions and blurring “the distinction between categories of ‘anonymous’, ‘known’ and ‘identity release’ donations” ( Jadva et al, 2018 :112).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decade, literature has addressed diverse treatments and travel routes. [8][9][10][11][12][13] Yet as Kaspar (p.125) notes, 14 'research on medical travel has hitherto largely underestimated cancer' . The lacunae is surprising given the prognosis of cancer increases demand for timely, effective and, what are perceived as, higher quality treatments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%