1998
DOI: 10.1037/0022-006x.66.2.313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment decision making and adjustment to breast cancer: A longitudinal study.

Abstract: This study monitored women (N = 76) with breast cancer from diagnosis through 1 year, and tested constructs from subjective expected utility theory with regard to their ability to predict patients' choice of surgical treatment as well as psychological distress and well-being over time. Women's positive expectancies for the consequences of treatment generally were maintained in favorable perceptions of outcome in several realms (i.e., physician agreement, likelihood of cancer cure or recurrence, self-evaluation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
79
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
6
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most women in this study experienced some psychological morbidity at follow-up. E-OI exacerbated psychological morbidity at 1-month post-surgery, consistent with reports of E-OI predicting psychological morbidity at 3 months post-surgery [19]. So, if the breast surgical outcome turns out to be incongruent with their expectations, Chinese women are, like their Caucasian counterparts, likely to experience greater psychological distress.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Most women in this study experienced some psychological morbidity at follow-up. E-OI exacerbated psychological morbidity at 1-month post-surgery, consistent with reports of E-OI predicting psychological morbidity at 3 months post-surgery [19]. So, if the breast surgical outcome turns out to be incongruent with their expectations, Chinese women are, like their Caucasian counterparts, likely to experience greater psychological distress.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…a worse outcome than expected), while a negative discrepancy score indicates an impact less than that anticipated (i.e. a better outcome than expected) [19]. Possible total discrepancy scores ranged from À48 to +48.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It also enabled the separate examination of the perceived effectiveness (expectancy) and perceived value (utility) associated with each of the goals. This theory has been applied previously to investigate health-related decision-making, including patient decisions regarding treatment for breast cancer (Stanton et al, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%