2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.01.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of adolescent pilonidal disease with a new modification to the Limberg flap: Symmetrically rotated rhomboid excision and lateralization of the Limberg flap technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
23
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these reasons, there is debate about whether obesity is an important factor in the formation of pilonidal sinus disease [13][14][15]. In this retrospective study, 47.8% of patients had a BMI of 25 or greater.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Among these reasons, there is debate about whether obesity is an important factor in the formation of pilonidal sinus disease [13][14][15]. In this retrospective study, 47.8% of patients had a BMI of 25 or greater.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…(Table ). Moreover, there is some evidence supporting the use of the Dufoumentel rhomboid flap over the Limberg flap, with advantages such as flexibility, simplicity of reconstruction, repeatability and good outcomes in terms of the recurrence rate being reported …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Usually the lowest part of the PD area is located on the midline and this region has to be very carefully excised, so any methods that shift the rhombic excision to the side may be end up leaving some infected tissue behind, leading to a recurrence. 2,14 Reconstruction is not very difficult and enables tension-free closure of the defect with flattening of the natal cleft 2 (Fig. 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One modification of this method may be a symmetrically rotated rhomboid excision, especially when the inflamed tissue is located laterally to the midline. 14 In a review of 10,000 patients and 74 studies, Petersen et al found that off-midline closure are superior to midline closure in terms of suture line breakdown and dehiscence (3-5 vs. 9%) and recurrence (1-3 vs. 9.5%). Better results were observed in the Limberg and Dufourmentel group in comparison to the midline-closure group (which the authors of the current study used before the introduction of the DMLF).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%