2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2002.00375.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of enterocele by abdominal colporectosacropexy – efficacy on pelvic pressure

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Enterocele induces pelvic pressure, obstructed defaecation, lower abdominal pain and/or false urge to defaecate in patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of abdominal colporectosacropexy in these symptoms, especially on pelvic pressure. METHODS: Sixty-two consecutive women with enterocele were included. All patients were symptomatic because they had: pelvic pressure (n = 62), obstructed defaecation (n = 40), lower abdominal pain (n = 8) or faecal incontinence (n = 16). Defaecog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
27
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of an isolated mechanical outlet obstruction, which can be the result of a second-or third-degree enterocele, treatment of this cele by abdominal pexy can be efficacy on pelvic pressure but not on obstructed defecation [13]. This is confirmed by findings in an earlier study by Orrom et al, in which they conclude that rectopexy, by posterior or combined anterior and posterior fixation, can result in a significant amelioration of symptoms of obstructed defecation during initial follow-up, but during the time many patients reported even worsening of complaints as reflected by an increase in tenesmus, stool frequency and incomplete emptying [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of an isolated mechanical outlet obstruction, which can be the result of a second-or third-degree enterocele, treatment of this cele by abdominal pexy can be efficacy on pelvic pressure but not on obstructed defecation [13]. This is confirmed by findings in an earlier study by Orrom et al, in which they conclude that rectopexy, by posterior or combined anterior and posterior fixation, can result in a significant amelioration of symptoms of obstructed defecation during initial follow-up, but during the time many patients reported even worsening of complaints as reflected by an increase in tenesmus, stool frequency and incomplete emptying [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,28 Given that most patients still have evacuation problems after enterocele repair, 6,13 enterocele is unlikely to be a main cause of obstructed defecation. However, some authors do report an improvement in defecation after resection or colporectosacropexy, 29 indicating that enterocele may be the cause of constipation in some cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14] Rectocele and rectal prolapse can be readily diagnosed by clinical and defecographic findings, but invasive studies such as defecography combined with peritoneography have been required to diagnose accompanying enteroceles or sigmoidoceles. 12,13,15 Recent progress in diagnostic imaging techniques has facilitated the dynamic assessment of such abnormalities with dynamic MRI [6][7][8] or multislice CT. 10 To date, defecography has played a major role in the morphological evaluation of patients with defecation disorders, but it does not always explain all clinical findings. Its limitations have been overcome by simultaneous performance of peritoneography to evaluate surrounding structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%