1953
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.4849.1304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Irreducible Intussusception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1954
1954
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have found a 48‐hour period between the two stages sufficient, and we like to proceed with the second stage before the Paul's tubes drop out, with the resultant soiling of the skin and possible infection of the wound. We have not used a “spur” type of double‐barrelled enterostomy; we dislike this procedure in infants because of the occasional difficulties associated with its closure and the consequent delay in re‐establishing normal bowel function (Jones, 1953). The average length of stay in hospital in our nine surviving cases was 17 days.…”
Section: Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have found a 48‐hour period between the two stages sufficient, and we like to proceed with the second stage before the Paul's tubes drop out, with the resultant soiling of the skin and possible infection of the wound. We have not used a “spur” type of double‐barrelled enterostomy; we dislike this procedure in infants because of the occasional difficulties associated with its closure and the consequent delay in re‐establishing normal bowel function (Jones, 1953). The average length of stay in hospital in our nine surviving cases was 17 days.…”
Section: Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%