2012
DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.95584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of skeletal class II division 1 malocclusion with mandibular deficiency using myofunctional appliances in growing individuals

Abstract: Class II division 1 malocclusion is the most common malocclusion seen in day-to-day practice. The majority of the patients with class II division 1 malocclusions have the presence of underlying skeletal discrepancy between maxilla and mandible. The treatment of skeletal class II division 1 depends upon the age of the patient, growth potential, severity of malocclusion, and compliance of patient with treatment. Myofunctional appliance can be successfully used to treat growing patients with class II division 1 m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact justified the changes that occurred in relation to the distance of Line E from the lower part of the lower lip. This was in agreement with other studies that evaluated the tegumentary effects of mandibular protraction -similar to the MPA, which had significant effect on improvement of the profile [13][14][15] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This fact justified the changes that occurred in relation to the distance of Line E from the lower part of the lower lip. This was in agreement with other studies that evaluated the tegumentary effects of mandibular protraction -similar to the MPA, which had significant effect on improvement of the profile [13][14][15] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Several authors have studied the effects of Class II treatment by means of cephalometric evaluation 13,14 , including cephalometric changes in MPA treatment 3,13,15 but there is a scarcity of studies in the literature assessing the effects of mandibular protraction by the Ricketts Analysis. Those that used Ricketts, only evaluated alterations in the profile, mesialization of the first molars, and verified the upper airway space [16][17][18] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This disproportion is usually due to mandibular retrusion [12] . In growing patient, growth modification by functional appliances is a well-known strategy to reduce mandibular retrognathism by accelerating the development of the mandible [13] . Many functional appliances are available for achieving this, but clinicians usually seek for simple and effective ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salah satu alat fungsional yang sering digunakan dalam merawat klas II divisi 1 adalah Bionator. 6 Bionator pertama kali dikembangkan oleh Wihelm Balter tahun 1964 dan merupakan alat terbuat dari akrilik dengan kawat pada bagian palatinal dan vestibulum. Alat ini bekerja untuk memajukan mandibula, mengokoreksi overbite, mengatur erupsi gigi dan memperbaiki profil pasien.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified