2005
DOI: 10.1139/x05-185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree growth response to climate change at the deciduous–boreal forest ecotone, Ontario, Canada

Abstract: We consider the implications of climate change on the future of the three dominant forest species, sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.), white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss), and balsam fir (Abies balsamea (L.) Mill.), at the deciduous–boreal forest ecotone, Ontario, Canada. Our analysis is based on individual species responses to past monthly temperature and precipitation conditions in light of modeled (general circulation model) monthly temperature and precipitation conditions in the study area for the 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
70
2
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
70
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these studies, boreal forests are projected to temporarily become a carbon source as deciduous forests are expected to move northward, but only after evergreen withdrawal [49], while the artic becomes a sink as boreal species migrate into regions previously classified as tundra [48][49][50][51]. Our results project evergreen forests moving into higher latitudes [49,52,53], and deciduous forests moving into areas previous classified as evergreen [54]. These changes at the PFT level ( Figure 5) likely mask larger and more complex underlying changes at the species level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Based on these studies, boreal forests are projected to temporarily become a carbon source as deciduous forests are expected to move northward, but only after evergreen withdrawal [49], while the artic becomes a sink as boreal species migrate into regions previously classified as tundra [48][49][50][51]. Our results project evergreen forests moving into higher latitudes [49,52,53], and deciduous forests moving into areas previous classified as evergreen [54]. These changes at the PFT level ( Figure 5) likely mask larger and more complex underlying changes at the species level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Coupled with increasing uncertainty surrounding inter-annual variability of precipitation in the future (Kharin et al, 2007), changes in plant population and community dynamics become an area of concern (McCarragher et al, 2011;Walck et al, 2011). Noticeable shifts in species distributions have already been documented (Beckage et al, 2008;Lenoir et al, 2008), and are predicted to continue in the future (Zhu et al, 2012) as species attempt to maintain their bioclimatic niches (Goldblum and Rigg, 2005;Iverson and Prasad, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a selection of approaches for modeling tree growth ranging from relatively simply models using climatic data only (Laroque & Smith 2003, Goldblum & Rigg 2005, Takahashi & Okuhara 2013) to more complex ones using additional ecophysiological variables as predictors for regression equations (Rathgeber et al 2005, Girardin et al 2008. For instance, Laroque & Smith (2003) and Takahashi & Okuhara (2013) used temperature and precipitation to predict tree-ring width, while Girardin et al (2008) extended this empirical approach by incorporating process-based physiological model results into the regression equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%