2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2106.08251
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trellis Decoding For Qudit Stabilizer Codes And Its Application To Qubit Topological Codes

Abstract: We further develop the theoretical framework for the quantum trellis decoder proposed by Ollivier and Tillich in 2006. We show that while conceptually different, certain results from the theory of trellis decoding for classical linear block codes have quantum analogies. We compare and contrast the two theories throughout. The decoder works for any stabilizer code S and separates into two parts: an expensive, one-time, offline computation which builds a compact, graphical representation of the normalizer of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This causes stabilizer codes to exhibit a particular coset structure in which multiple different error patterns act identically on the transmitted information [58,65,66]. Although the manifestation of degeneracy in the design of sparse quantum codes and its effects on the decoding process has been studied extensively [16,55,56,67,68,69,70,71], especially for QTCs and quantum topological codes [29,68,72,73,74], it remains a somewhat obscure topic in the literature. This can be attributed to the varying and sometimes inconsistent notation and the oft confusing nature of the notion of degeneracy itself.…”
Section: Understanding and Exploiting Degeneracymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This causes stabilizer codes to exhibit a particular coset structure in which multiple different error patterns act identically on the transmitted information [58,65,66]. Although the manifestation of degeneracy in the design of sparse quantum codes and its effects on the decoding process has been studied extensively [16,55,56,67,68,69,70,71], especially for QTCs and quantum topological codes [29,68,72,73,74], it remains a somewhat obscure topic in the literature. This can be attributed to the varying and sometimes inconsistent notation and the oft confusing nature of the notion of degeneracy itself.…”
Section: Understanding and Exploiting Degeneracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we will restrict the discussion to the sum-product based decoding of stabilizer codes, which (mostly) concerns QLDPC and QTC codes [46,110,111,112]. Certain families of stabilizer codes, such as topological codes [72,73,74], can be decoded differently and so this discussion may not apply to them.…”
Section: Decoding Quantum Stabilizer Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MWPM achieves a threshold of 13.3% on the (4,8,8) color codes without specifying the complexity [30] and a threshold of 13.05% on the (6,6,6) color codes with complexity O(N 4 ) [31]. (Decoding the (4,8,8) color codes is considered relatively harder from the trellis complexity of the code [34].) AMBP 4 , on the other hand, can decode a color code by just giving its check matrix, without additional processes.…”
Section: Decoding Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The logical error rate is a well-known metric and has been widely employed to assess the performance of other families of Quantum Error Correction (QEC) codes such as Quantum Turbo Codes (QTC) and quantum topological codes [10], [35]- [38]. For these particular error correction VOLUME 4, 2016 schemes, the decoders that are employed are sometimes capable of distinguishing between error equivalence classes (they can account for some aspects of degeneracy), which makes it easy to compute the logical error rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%