1999
DOI: 10.1136/tc.8.3.266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in environmental tobacco smoke restrictions in the home in Victoria, Australia

Abstract: Objective-To assess the extent to which smokers and non-smokers in Victoria, Australia attempt to keep their homes smoke free and to determine whether the proportion of people attempting to do so has changed over time. Indoor restrictions on smoking were associated with the presence of children in the household and even more strongly with the presence of non-smoking adults. People who worked in places where smoking was totally banned were more likely to ask their visitors not to smoke than those who worked whe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
83
2
7

Year Published

2001
2001
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(5 reference statements)
7
83
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results provide evidence that smokers ' perceptions of nonsmoking directives at baseline can transform their smoking norms, which legislation serves to reinforce. These fi ndings support previous research demonstrating a link between approval of bans and perceptions of smoking as less normative ( Albers et al, 2007 ;Borland, Mullins, Trotter, & White, 1999 ;Trotter, Wakefi eld, & Borland, 2002 ), which are propagated in peer networks, through communication about the relevant norm ( Perkins, 1997 ;Real & Rimal, 2007 ). Similar fi ndings were obtained for smokers in both Scotland and the rest of the United Kingdom in terms of changes in social unacceptability of smoking.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Our results provide evidence that smokers ' perceptions of nonsmoking directives at baseline can transform their smoking norms, which legislation serves to reinforce. These fi ndings support previous research demonstrating a link between approval of bans and perceptions of smoking as less normative ( Albers et al, 2007 ;Borland, Mullins, Trotter, & White, 1999 ;Trotter, Wakefi eld, & Borland, 2002 ), which are propagated in peer networks, through communication about the relevant norm ( Perkins, 1997 ;Real & Rimal, 2007 ). Similar fi ndings were obtained for smokers in both Scotland and the rest of the United Kingdom in terms of changes in social unacceptability of smoking.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Attitudes and practices towards tobacco smoke 24 In a Victorian study, 15 respondents were asked if they discouraged visitors from smoking inside, rather than whether there was a total ban on inter nal smoking. Although the proportion responding affirmatively nearly doubled from 27% in 1989 to 53% in 1997, 15 the f igure remained substantially lower than the more recent data on the proportions supporting total bans reported here.…”
Section: Policy -Practice Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Clearly, given the changing public legislative climate, it is important to measure current community views about ETS. 15 No recent New South Wales study has assessed public perceptions of a wide range of ETS issues. Therefore, the present study sought to document public knowledge of ETSrelated health risks as well as attitudes and practices in relation to ETS in homes, motor vehicles and licensed premises.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the infants reported to be exposed in the previous three days, 10% [95% CI [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] were reported as exposed in the home, 6% [95% CI 2-9] were reported as exposed in the car, none were reported as exposed at child care, 22% [95% CI [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] were reported as exposed at a friend or relative's home, 18% [95% CI [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] were reported as exposed at a shopping centre, 8% [CI [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] were reported as exposed at a restaurant or hotel and 8% [CI 4-13] were reported as exposed in an outdoor location.…”
Section: Location Of Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%