2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2004.10.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in low-temperature water?gas shift reactivity on transition metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
143
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
9
143
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…46 According to the CO 2 -TPD results, Fe 3 O 4 shows higher adsorption capacity than Cu at 240-280 C, as well as stronger adsorption of CO 2 to its surface. [46][47][48] Additionally, H 2 -TPD results showed that between 240 and 280 C, dissociative adsorption of H 2 primarily occurred on Cu. In many DFT calculations, [47][48][49] it has been found that Cu-based catalyst that have been doped with transition metal oxide additives adsorb H 2 by dissociative adsorption onto Cu, while the transition metal oxides adsorb and activate CO 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…46 According to the CO 2 -TPD results, Fe 3 O 4 shows higher adsorption capacity than Cu at 240-280 C, as well as stronger adsorption of CO 2 to its surface. [46][47][48] Additionally, H 2 -TPD results showed that between 240 and 280 C, dissociative adsorption of H 2 primarily occurred on Cu. In many DFT calculations, [47][48][49] it has been found that Cu-based catalyst that have been doped with transition metal oxide additives adsorb H 2 by dissociative adsorption onto Cu, while the transition metal oxides adsorb and activate CO 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[46][47][48] Additionally, H 2 -TPD results showed that between 240 and 280 C, dissociative adsorption of H 2 primarily occurred on Cu. In many DFT calculations, [47][48][49] it has been found that Cu-based catalyst that have been doped with transition metal oxide additives adsorb H 2 by dissociative adsorption onto Cu, while the transition metal oxides adsorb and activate CO 2 . Subsequent CO 2 desorb from the metal oxide surface and adsorb to metallic Cu to allow the adsorbed species to react with dissociated H at the Cu site; this causes the deformation activation of O@C@O linear configurations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Carbon monoxide is required by both Reactions (1) and (2) and conversion of CO can be expected to be rather high. Schumacher et al [7] also tested catalysts under forward WGS feed conditions. For the catalysts investigated on an aluminum oxide support the following experimental trend was found Cu > Co > Ru > Ni > Pt > Au > Fe > Pd > Rh > Ir.…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microkinetics modeling explores the detailed chemistry of the reaction. Although the WGS reaction involves only four simple molecules, the reaction mechanism is quite complex and depends on the catalyst and feed composition [6][7][8]. A direct experimental investigation of a particular mechanism for WGS reaction is difficult or impossible under realistic operating conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-OH groups, interact with which specific methanol-derived C 1 -oxygenates to form the optimum CO 2 precursor species. For this reason the propensity of Cu or other metal surfaces [18] and of ZnO surfaces [19][20][21][22][23] for water dissociation, being an important aspect for all reforming reactions, has already been studied extensively. However, pure ZnO is unselective with respect to CO 2 formation and rather favors CO production [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%