2004
DOI: 10.1207/s15327590ijhc1701_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in Usability Research and Activities in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other literature reviews have examined UX-related trends from research in specific disciplines: human-computer interaction (Hooper & Dix, 2012); research involving particular technologies, such as mobile devices and applications (de Sá & Carriço, 2011;Hao et al, 2016;Ismail et al, 2016;Kjeldskov & Graham, 2003), virtual reality (VR) and artificial reality (AR) (Kim, 2012), automatic teller machines (Mkpojiogu & Asuquo, 2018), and smart homes (Kim et al, 2013); and research trends in particular cultures (Kurosu et al, 2004).…”
Section: Trends In Ux Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other literature reviews have examined UX-related trends from research in specific disciplines: human-computer interaction (Hooper & Dix, 2012); research involving particular technologies, such as mobile devices and applications (de Sá & Carriço, 2011;Hao et al, 2016;Ismail et al, 2016;Kjeldskov & Graham, 2003), virtual reality (VR) and artificial reality (AR) (Kim, 2012), automatic teller machines (Mkpojiogu & Asuquo, 2018), and smart homes (Kim et al, 2013); and research trends in particular cultures (Kurosu et al, 2004).…”
Section: Trends In Ux Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential contribution of explicitly local or indigenous perspectives, approaches, and experiences with HCI tends to remain unknown, e.g. [4]. The literature reviewed so far reports on case studies where user involvement and developer-client relations are shaped by invisible power relations embedded in artefacts and transactions scripted in design and development methods and how situations of breakdown or empirical [e,g, 18,19].…”
Section: Towards a Geopolitical Analysis Of Hcimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential contribution of explicitly local or indigenous perspectives, approaches, and experiences with HCI tends to remain unknown, e.g. [4], and, it is argued, subject to political forces that make them remain largely invisible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To progress this research we must start by better understanding relationships between HCI concepts and methods and their meanings to local and indigenous groups. Universal perspectives on HCI like ethnology and ethnography, for example, technomethodology (Button & Dourish, 1996), and national culture models (Hofstede, 2001) and activity theory (Kaptelinin & Nardi, 2006), have all had an impact in the design of interactive systems for culturally different users, but the potential contribution of explicitly local or indigenous perspectives, approaches, and experiences with HCI (see, e.g., Kurosu et al, 2004) have not become so clear and uniform. Furthermore, the idea of what constitutes a useful and usable system in different cultural contexts remains partially explored at the very least.…”
Section: What Is Meant By Local and Indigenous Hci And Why This Ismentioning
confidence: 99%