Triagem auditiva neonatal: um estudo na cidade de Curitiba - PR

Stumpf, Candice Cristina; Gambini, C.; Jacob-Corteletti, Lílian Cássia Bórnia; Roggia, Simone Mariotto

doi:10.1590/s1516-18462009000300016

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Test failure rate was comparable to that reported in another study, performed in four maternities in Paraná, that found 5%, 3% and 2% in three of the institutions (data were not presented in the last) 10 , but lower than presented in studies conducted in secondary-level maternities, which found 11.7% and 25.3% 9,11 .…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 85%

Evaluation of newborn hearing screening program

Marinho¹,

Pereira²,

Torres³

et al. 2020

Rev. saúde pública

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Newborn Hearing Screening Program of Hospital Regional de Sobradinho, from January 2016 to December 2017, according to Multiprofessional Committee on Auditory Health parameters and Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) recommendations, as well as to describe the prevalence of risk factors for hearing loss within the study population and their impact on the respective program. METHOD: This is a quantitative, cross-sectional and retrospective study that carefully analyzed registration books of screened newborns. It was established the prevalence of “pass” and “fail” in test and retest, retest percentage of attendance and referral for audiological diagnosis. Risk factors for hearing loss were described, as well as their influence on “pass” and “fail” rates. Inferential statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test and Anderson-Darling test, with 5% reliability index. RESULTS: A total of 3,981 newborns were screened; 2,963 (74.4%) presented no risk factors whereas 1,018 (25.6%) did, prematurity being the most frequent (51.6%). In the test, 166 (4.2%) failed and 118 (71.1%) attended the retest. The referral rate for diagnosis was 0.3%. CONCLUSION: Regarding the percentage of referral for diagnosis, the program reached indexes recommended by the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing and Multiprofessional Committee on Auditory Health. The most prevalent risk factor within the population was prematurity.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 85%

Evaluation of newborn hearing screening program

Marinho¹,

Pereira²,

Torres³

et al. 2020

Rev. saúde pública

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The mean age was higher in the low-risk group, because this was seen outside the maternity unlike the high risk newborns that were assessed in maternity, reinforcing the idea that the NHS should be performed, preferably before discharge hospital, aimed at early detection of hearing impairment. When comparing studies that were evaluated universal NHS and optional NHS, it can be seen the precocity evaluations of universal programs, but in the rate of avoidance of these studies, we find great variability of results, it is not possible to make a determination directly proportional between the dropout index of the programs and type of screening program (12,13,16,19,20,(29)(30) . This study was conducted with the population assessed at a private service and therefore belong to a middle socioeconomic level.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Finally, we highlight the need to use an information system for data management services for the NHS to be possible to (1) Note: NB = newborn; TOAE = transient otoacoustic emissions; DPOAE = distortion product otoacoustic emission; UNHS = universal newborn hearing screening; BERA = brain evoked response audiometry; EBR = eye blink reflex obtain the national prevalence of hearing loss and to establish, then, the epidemiological profile of the country (30) . To improve the NHS program in question, it is proposed greater integration of the health team that serves the NB through active search among professionals, in order to decrease the dropout rate of children and that they are accompanied by the diagnosis, fitting and rehabilitation, if necessary.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resultados de um programa de triagem auditiva neonatal em Cuiabá: Mato Grosso

Rodrigues

Carvalho

Lauris

et al. 2011

Rev. soc. bras. fonoaudiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJETIVO: Descrever os resultados obtidos em um programa de triagem auditiva neonatal, localizado na cidade de Cuiabá (MT) no período de 2009 a 2010. MÉTODOS: Foram analisados os exames de emissões otoacústicas de 1964 recém-nascidos de baixo risco e de 123 recém-nascidos de alto risco, arquivados no computador do serviço, em relação à quantidade dos que passaram ou falharam na triagem. RESULTADOS: No grupo de baixo risco 94,5% dos sujeitos passaram; 1,2% falharam e 4,3% não retornaram para o reteste. No grupo de alto risco, 71,54% passaram; 3,2% falharam e 25,4% não retornaram para o reteste. CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados obtidos pelo programa estão de acordo com as expectativas de órgãos internacionais e nacionais.

show abstract

“…Uberlândia, 57,93%, havendo uma queda significativa nos anos de 2018 e 2019, devido aos equipamentos de EOA estarem danificados a partir de maio de 2018 (Anexo A) sendo necessária a diminuição de oferta de vagas. Consequentemente houve um decréscimo na cobertura da TAN, ficando abaixo da cobertura indicada pelo Comitê Multiprofissional em comparados ao estudo realizado na cidade de Curitiba, Paraná onde na caracterização dos resultados de três maternidades, apontaram falha em 5%, 3% e 2%(STUMPF et al, 2009). Porém há estudos que apresentam um número maior de retestes variando entre 4,2% e 39,77%, podendo associar o número elevado de retestes a locais com barulho, alterações do conduto auditivo externo, presença de secreção na orelha média, agitação da criança e gripe(COSTA, 2018;MARINHO et al, 2020;MARTINS;TAVARES, 2012; MICHELON et al, 2013).…”

unclassified

Saúde auditiva: caracterização do serviço de referência em triagem auditiva neonatal de Uberlândia-MG

Oliveira¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Hearing is one of the most important senses, being developed since pregnancy.Any type of hearing loss can lead to alterations in language development, educational difficulties, isolation and social stigmatization. The diagnosis of hearing loss must be carried out as early as possible, through the Neonatal Hearing Screening, and must be carried out within the first 30 days of life. In Uberlândia, the NHS is performed at the Reference Service in Neonatal Hearing Screening of the Speech Therapy Sector at the Clinics Hospital of the Federal University of Uberlândia (CH-UFU). Objectives: To analyze the profile of the SRTAN, relating the NHS data to the IRDA and to propose improvements to achieve the indicators proposed in the literature. Methodology: This is an analytical and descriptive crosssectional study. Data were collected from CH-UFU's SRTAN electronic files between 2015 and 2019, in .xml format and converted to .sav of the PSPP free software license. Results:From 2015 to 2019, 23,794 NHS exams were performed, corresponding to 32.90% of live births in the coverage area. The number of newborns evaluated exceeded that of live births at the CH-UFU, due to screening newborns from other hospitals in Uberlândia and region. There is no linearity in the frequency of the number of exams performed. In 2016, a higher percentage of newborns was seen, with a significant drop in 2018 and 2019 due to damaged OAE equipment. There is a growing increase in newborns absent from assessments in the last two years of the study, which may be associated with the temporary suspension of assessments within the NICU or rooming-in. Of the OAE exams performed, 98% passed, with no discriminated record of laterality. Of the total number of exams performed, 22,308 children were referred for follow-up in the municipality's Primary Care, 427 required a retest within 15 days of the first screening, 213 were referred for diagnosis and 846 were referred for audiological monitoring up to 3 years of age. The median age of NHS was 15 days of life and most were before 30 days of life. The percentage of RIHL found showed a low prevalence, increased by more than 200% in the last two years, possibly due to the updating and standardization of the applied protocol. The itemized registration of IRDA was only carried out in 2018, observing a greater occurrence of prematurity. Due to the lack of standardization in the protocol, there was no record of IRDA in 55 evaluated, in 2018 and 29 in 2019. Conclusion: Although the SRTAN is of paramount importance and accomplishes what was planned, there is a need to standardize and improve results, with investment to avoid the suspension of the Service and delay in diagnosis. It is essential that the protocols suggested in the literature are applied and that diagnosis and intervention take place as early as possible. In addition to standardizing the data collected, it is necessary to analyze the care and procedures in order to provide a solution for the problems detected and guide public policies for the p...

show abstract

Triagem auditiva neonatal: um estudo na cidade de Curitiba - PR

Cited by 7 publications

References 20 publications

Evaluation of newborn hearing screening program

Evaluation of newborn hearing screening program

Resultados de um programa de triagem auditiva neonatal em Cuiabá: Mato Grosso

Saúde auditiva: caracterização do serviço de referência em triagem auditiva neonatal de Uberlândia-MG

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About