2010
DOI: 10.1107/s1744309110012078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trial by fire: are the crystals macromolecules?

Abstract: Protein crystallization screens frequently yield salt crystals as well as protein crystals. A simple method for determining whether a crystal is composed of salt or macromolecules is suggested. A drop containing one or more crystals is transferred to a glass cover slip and the cover slip is then passed through the flame of a Bunsen burner. Macromolecule crystals are destroyed by this treatment, while salt crystals generally remain. The test can be performed after other commonly used tests such as crushing and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While Crystal Screens I and II (Hampton Research) as well as Wizard Screens I and II (Emerald BioSystems) produced many trial solutions containing microcrystals, the largest crystals formed overnight when 1 ml protein solution was equilibrated against an empty reservoir. The crystals were verified to be composed of protein using IZIT dye (Hampton Research) and the melt test (Raghunathan et al, 2010) and crystal growth was reproduced using silanized glass cover slips suspended over the empty wells of VDX plates (Hampton Research). Cryoprotection was achieved by using a nylon loop to drag the crystal through a solution of paraffin oil.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Crystal Screens I and II (Hampton Research) as well as Wizard Screens I and II (Emerald BioSystems) produced many trial solutions containing microcrystals, the largest crystals formed overnight when 1 ml protein solution was equilibrated against an empty reservoir. The crystals were verified to be composed of protein using IZIT dye (Hampton Research) and the melt test (Raghunathan et al, 2010) and crystal growth was reproduced using silanized glass cover slips suspended over the empty wells of VDX plates (Hampton Research). Cryoprotection was achieved by using a nylon loop to drag the crystal through a solution of paraffin oil.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these limitations are common problems associated with complex formation using the soaking technique, rather than co-crystallization, soaking is still often employed for structural studies of many complexes. It is notable that despite the rigidity imposed by the pre-formed crystals, flexibility around the binding site, flipping of loops and other significant conformational changes in protein crystals are frequently observed (Gill et al, 2005;Hartshorn et al, 2005;Bosch et al, 2006;Verlinde et al, 2009;Raghunathan et al, 2010;Parker et al, 2012;Chilingaryan et al, 2012). Although co-crystallization is generally the preferred technique, soaking ligands into crystals can produce excellent and informative results, as long as the regions involved in the binding site do not form crystal contacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crystals found and sieved by the melt test [26] were reproduced by hanging drop method with 3 ll of protein solution mixed with an equal volume of reservoir solution drawn from the 400 ll present in the well of a 24-well VDX crystallization plate (Hampton Research) at 25°C.…”
Section: Crystallization and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%