2017 IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/hpec.2017.8091051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triangle counting for scale-free graphs at scale in distributed memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in Fig. 9, we see that MEGA with θ * outperforms the algorithm in [39] on different real-world networks by averagely 2.97 times faster. Therefore, we conclude that if we can find an optimal threshold θ * that leverages the structure of the graph in advance, then MEGA can complete the counting task in pruning with a computational time complexity of O(N ) and beat the algorithm in [39].…”
Section: Evaluation On Real-world Networkmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in Fig. 9, we see that MEGA with θ * outperforms the algorithm in [39] on different real-world networks by averagely 2.97 times faster. Therefore, we conclude that if we can find an optimal threshold θ * that leverages the structure of the graph in advance, then MEGA can complete the counting task in pruning with a computational time complexity of O(N ) and beat the algorithm in [39].…”
Section: Evaluation On Real-world Networkmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We compare MEGA with the algorithm in [39], which is an award-winning work of the MIT/Amazon/IEEE Graph Challenge [14]. The algorithm in [39] assigns direction to each edge based on the degree of each vertex. It implies that, for each vertex v, there are deg + (v) , where |E(G)| is the time complexity of the direction assignment and deg + max is the maximum outdegree.…”
Section: Evaluation On Real-world Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, • denotes element-wise multiplication III. COMMUNITY SUBMISSIONS Graph Challenge 2017 received 22 submissions by 111 authors from 36 organizations [24]- [31], [34]- [41], [48]- [53]. The submissions were judged by a panel of experts on their effectiveness at using Graph Challenge to highlight innovations in graph algorithms, hardware, software, and systems.…”
Section: Triangle Countingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm is based on the asynchronous visitor queue approach presented in the paper and the algorithm is similar to PSP algorithm we discussed above. An extension of this work is presented at the static graph challenge [23].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%