2015
DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20152109009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tribological impact of the finishing technology onto meso- and microforming processes

Abstract: Abstract. Tribological conditions between workpiece and tool have a major impact onto forming processes. Besides lubrication, temperature, and material, they are mainly influenced by the tool surface characteristics, especially by its topography, which is a result of finishing technology. Thereby formed lubricant pockets are of prime importance for the tribosystem due to its ability to separate the tribopartners by storing lubricant. The influence of four different tool finishing processes and their according … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, surface roughness in microforming is a part of sample geometry while in macroscale merely it is surface characteristic [8]. In addition to the conventional models, including Hall-Petch model, inclusive models such as the modified surface layer and open and close lubricant pockets models have been proposed to explain flow stress reduction and surface characteristics in microscale [9][10][11]. Yet, the mentioned and modified models are not capable of clarifying size effects expansively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, surface roughness in microforming is a part of sample geometry while in macroscale merely it is surface characteristic [8]. In addition to the conventional models, including Hall-Petch model, inclusive models such as the modified surface layer and open and close lubricant pockets models have been proposed to explain flow stress reduction and surface characteristics in microscale [9][10][11]. Yet, the mentioned and modified models are not capable of clarifying size effects expansively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%