2005
DOI: 10.1002/zaac.200570016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tricarbonyl Derivatives of Manganese(I) with Diphosphinite Chelating Ligands

Abstract: Reaction of [MnBr(CO) 3 L] [L ϭ Ph 2 POCH 2 CH 2 OPPh 2 , L 1 , {(CH 3 ) 2 CH} 2 POCH 2 CH 2 OP{CH(CH 3 ) 2 } 2 , L 2 ] with AgO 3 SCF 3 and AgO 2 CCF 3 in dichloromethane afforded the new complexes [Mn(O 3 SCF 3 )(CO) 3 L] and [Mn(O 2 CCF 3 )(CO) 3 L], respectively. Substitution of O 3 SCF 3 resulted in the new species [Mn(SCN)(CO) 3 L], [Mn(NCCH 3 )(CO) 3 L](O 3 SCF 3 ) and, in the case of L 2 , [Mn(CN)(CO) 3 L 2 ]. By contrast, any attempt to displace the O 2 CCF 3 ligand in the same way was unsuccessful. A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This arrangement stabilises, in spite of the strain, a ruthena-phospha-oxa-cyclobutane ring. As the only source of CO is the bis(phosphinite) L ligand, and we did not observe similar behaviour for L with other metals, [18] these fragments must come from a metal-promoted disruption of the bidentate ligand. Moreover, although the yields are low, the reaction is perfectly reproducible.…”
Section: [Rucl(co)(l)(ph 2 Poch 2 )] (8)contrasting
confidence: 43%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This arrangement stabilises, in spite of the strain, a ruthena-phospha-oxa-cyclobutane ring. As the only source of CO is the bis(phosphinite) L ligand, and we did not observe similar behaviour for L with other metals, [18] these fragments must come from a metal-promoted disruption of the bidentate ligand. Moreover, although the yields are low, the reaction is perfectly reproducible.…”
Section: [Rucl(co)(l)(ph 2 Poch 2 )] (8)contrasting
confidence: 43%
“…[17] This is probably not the situation in our case because we did not observe such a process in reactions between the same ligand and other metals such as Re and Mn. [18] Other authors have observed the same product (POP) and suggested a P-P(O) to P-O-P thermal rearrangement prior to metal coordination, [19] a process that is favoured when R groups bonded to P are inductively electron-withdrawing groups like OR groups (as in our case). A likely mechanism involves partial hydrolysis of the ligand due to the prolonged heating and the presence of adventitious moisture, followed by a tautomeric rearrangement from the P-P(O) to the P-O-P form.…”
Section: [Rucl 2 (L)(ph 2 Popph 2 )] (7)mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…We also examined 1•[Mn(CO)3(H2O)]Br by IR spectroscopy, which revealed characteristic CO stretches at 1951, 2040 and 1921 cm -1 . [35][36][37] Additionally, the phase purity of 1•[Mn(CO)3(H2O)]Br was confirmed by PXRD analysis (SI Figure S6.3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Quantitative metalation was confirmed by energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis, which yielded an Mn:Br ratio of 4:1. We also examined 1 ·[Mn­(CO) 3 (H 2 O)]Br by IR spectroscopy, which revealed characteristic CO stretches at 1951, 2040, and 1921 cm –1 . Additionally, the phase purity of 1 ·[Mn­(CO) 3 (H 2 O)]Br was confirmed by PXRD analysis (SI Figure S6.3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%