2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11224-010-9617-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tricarbonyltechnetium(I) and tricarbonylrhenium(I) complexed with N-methyl-2-pyridinecarboxyamide as potential radiopharmaceuticals: a computational study

Abstract: The electronic and thermodynamic properties of the '2 ? 1' tricarbonyltechnetium(I) and -rhenium(I) mixed ligand complexes with N-methylpyridine-2-carboxyamide (MPCA) as a bidentate ligand and chloride, water, or tert-butyl-3-isocyanopropanoate (BCP), were investigated within the framework of Density Functional Theory. The atomic charges of all complexes, polarization of the CO groups, as well as the effect of transfer of p-electron density between the ligands through the metal were calculated and compared. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 H NMR spectrum (CDCl 3 , δ, ppm; the atom numbering is the same as in Figure ): 8.855 d (2H, H bipy4,13 , 3 J 6.0 Hz), 8.59 d (2H, H bipy7,10 , 3 J 8.0 Hz), 8.34 t (2H, H bipy5,12 , 3 J 6.0 Hz), 7.65 t (2H, H bipy6,11 , 3 J 6.0 Hz), 4.48 s (2H, CN–C H 2 –COO−), 4.20 q (2H, C H 2 –CH 3 , 3 J 8.0 Hz), 1.25 t (3H, –C H 3 , 3 J 8.0 Hz). 13 C­{ 1 H} NMR spectrum (CDCl 3 , δ, ppm): 163.2 (1C, –COO−), 155.3 (2C, bipy , ), 153.0 (2C, bipy , ), 140.6 (2C, bipy , ), 127.4 (2C, bipy , ), 125.1 (2C, bipy , ), 63.2 (1C, –O– C H 2 –CH 3 ), 46.2 (1C, CN– C H 2 –COO−), 13.9 (1C, –O–CH 2 – C H 3 ). Calculated for [C 18 H 15 N 3 O 5 Tc]­(ClO 4 ), %: C 39.25, H 2.75, N 7.63, 99 Tc 17.79.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 H NMR spectrum (CDCl 3 , δ, ppm; the atom numbering is the same as in Figure ): 8.855 d (2H, H bipy4,13 , 3 J 6.0 Hz), 8.59 d (2H, H bipy7,10 , 3 J 8.0 Hz), 8.34 t (2H, H bipy5,12 , 3 J 6.0 Hz), 7.65 t (2H, H bipy6,11 , 3 J 6.0 Hz), 4.48 s (2H, CN–C H 2 –COO−), 4.20 q (2H, C H 2 –CH 3 , 3 J 8.0 Hz), 1.25 t (3H, –C H 3 , 3 J 8.0 Hz). 13 C­{ 1 H} NMR spectrum (CDCl 3 , δ, ppm): 163.2 (1C, –COO−), 155.3 (2C, bipy , ), 153.0 (2C, bipy , ), 140.6 (2C, bipy , ), 127.4 (2C, bipy , ), 125.1 (2C, bipy , ), 63.2 (1C, –O– C H 2 –CH 3 ), 46.2 (1C, CN– C H 2 –COO−), 13.9 (1C, –O–CH 2 – C H 3 ). Calculated for [C 18 H 15 N 3 O 5 Tc]­(ClO 4 ), %: C 39.25, H 2.75, N 7.63, 99 Tc 17.79.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among monodentate ligands for implementing the 2 + 1 B approach (tethering of a biomolecule via monodentate ligand), isonitriles seem to be the best choice , owing to the favorable combination of σ-donor and π-acceptor properties (ensuring high stability of the complexes), low steric demand, good complexation kinetics, and versatility in linking to biomolecules. For example, complexes with ω-isonitrile-derivatized higher fatty acids , show promise for myocardial imaging, whereas isonitrile-derivatized lower fatty acids can serve as bifunctional molecules for tethering the 99m Tc­(CO) 3 + core to diverse biomolecules. , Isonitriles as ligands for the 99m Tc­(CO) 3 + core have been examined in combination with diverse bidentate ligands. ,, As a rule, anionic bidentate ligands were chosen. It is believed that, with neutral bidentate ligands, the sixth coordination site in the tricarbonyl complexes will be occupied by the chloride ion necessarily present in the reaction medium, and its replacement by a monodentate ligand will be hindered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using DFT, Fuks et al [211] proved that in vitro behavior of tricarbonylrhenium(I) and tricarbonyltechnetium(I) complexed by the N-methyl-2-pyridinecarboxyamide and chloride, water or tert-butyl-3-isocyanopropionate is thermodynamically controlled. The energy of formation of the complexes containing tertbutyl-3-isocyanopropanoate ligand is more negative by a few kcal mol -1 than energy of those having a coordinated water molecules instead.…”
Section: Issuementioning
confidence: 99%