2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2022.116165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triethanolamine-modulated interfacial polymerization toward microcrumpled nanofiltration membranes: Performances and mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The OD of the tissue culture polystyrene (TPCS) group was higher than those of the SBC/Gel materials at the beginning of the cell culture (day 1), but then the SBC/Gel groups rapidly surpassed the TPCS group, following the same trend as in Fig. 4 G. The reason may be that the cells initially adhered more easily to the TPCS [ 29 , 30 ]. However, the proliferation rate was significantly higher than that of TPCS as the cells adapted to the 3D material, for the 3D material provided a better growth environment with interlocking and interpenetrating 3D pore structures, whereas on the 2D material, the cell growth space was gradually restricted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The OD of the tissue culture polystyrene (TPCS) group was higher than those of the SBC/Gel materials at the beginning of the cell culture (day 1), but then the SBC/Gel groups rapidly surpassed the TPCS group, following the same trend as in Fig. 4 G. The reason may be that the cells initially adhered more easily to the TPCS [ 29 , 30 ]. However, the proliferation rate was significantly higher than that of TPCS as the cells adapted to the 3D material, for the 3D material provided a better growth environment with interlocking and interpenetrating 3D pore structures, whereas on the 2D material, the cell growth space was gradually restricted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The diffusion rate of MPD and PIP monomers into the organic phase was measured by the following procedure. 23 First, 50 mL of 2.0 wt% MPD/PIP mixed solution (MPD/PIP mass ration ranging from 1 : 0 to 0 : 1) was poured into a 250 mL beaker, and 50 mL of 0.15 wt% TMC/ n -hexane was carefully injected into the aqueous phase. After 60 s duration, 3 mL of water containing MPD/PIP was removed from the aqueous and organic interface and placed in quartz cuvettes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At an appropriate TAPE concentration (0.50 w/v %), the polyamide layer exhibited relatively uniform and regular crumpled stripes (Figure 1f). 27 Further increase in TAPE concentration (0.75 w/v %) resulted in denser crumpled stripes (Figure 1g), which resulted from interfacial instability due to the increasingly vigorous IP reaction. 28 The cross-sectional TEM images of the TFC membranes demonstrated that the thickness of the polyamide layers was approximately 90.0 ± 4.3 nm (Figure S2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, TAPE-TMC presented enhanced connectivity of the micropores within the polymer network compared with PIP-TMC, which was attributed to the multiple reactive sites facilitating the formation of highly cross-linked polyamide network. 27,35 The separation performance of the membrane was evaluated by using a methanol solution containing methyl orange (MO). The effects of monomer concentration and IP reaction time were systematically investigated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%