Triglav National Park. Actors, Strategies, Problems, Solutions

Abstract

Triglavski narodni park akTerji, sTraTegije, problemi, rešiTve jurij FikFak in TaTiana bajuk senčar Avtorja uvodnega besedila zarisujeta kratko zgodovino raziskave Triglavskega narodnega parka, ki je bila osredinjena na različnost in večdimenzionalnost dediščinskih praks med deležniki v narodnem parku in drugimi socialnimi akterji. Opišeta in tematizirata prispevke raziskovalcev v kontekstu projektne konfiguracije. V razpravah, objavljenih v reviji Traditiones in drugod so raziskovalci in raziskovalke osvetlili nekatera ključna vprašanja in kulturno značilne in pomembne procese; s tem tudi prispevajo k globljemu razumevanju vsakdanjega življenja v Triglavskem narodnem parku kot zaščitenem območju. ključne besede: zaščiteno območje, Triglavski narodni park, naravna dediščina, kulturna dediščina, dediščinjenje, konflikti The authors of this introductory text present a brief history of the Triglav National Park research project, aimed at examining the diversity and multidimensionality of heritage practices among existing park stakeholders and social actors. They place the present contributions of researchers within the context of the project's structure and aims as well as the other studies published in the journal Traditiones. In these articles, the project researchers succeed in highlighting the key issues and culturally significant processes that contribute to a deeper understanding of everyday life in Triglav National Park as a protected area.

Flexible Boundaries at the Slovenian Raba Region

“…It is well known in anthropological literature that national parks and protected areas are the outcomes of social spatialization (Fikfak and Bajuk Senčar 2015;Więckowski 2018). Similarly to other Central and Eastern European examples (Denisiuk et al 1997), the majority of national parks in Hungary are situated in the vicinity of state borders.…”

Skrb za krhke krajine: krajina, skupnost in (ne)spremenljivost na Solčavskem

“…oblikovanja lokalnosti (oziroma lokalne identifikacije in lokalne skupnosti), krajine, turizma, dediščine in varovanih območij (npr. Bajuk Senčar, 2005Bajuk Senčar idr., 2019;Vranješ, 2005Vranješ, , 2008Simonič, 2006;Kozorog, 2009Kozorog, , 2015Fikfak idr., 2013Fikfak idr., , 2014Kozorog, Poljak Istenič, 2014;Repič, 2018Repič, , 2021Repič, , 2023, je primarni cilj prispevka identifikacija estetike skrbi in krhkosti. Skrb za krajino razumem kot vrednotenjski in zaznavni odnos, zato govorim o estetiki skrbi, za njeno hrbtno stran -torej tisto, brez česar tega vrednotenja in zaznavanja ne bi bilo -pa predlagam estetsko kategorijo krhkosti.…”

Learning by Collecting: Amateur Collectors and Their Shifting Positions in the Isonzo Front Heritagization and Tourism Adaptation

“…Within those projects, I already recorded private and publicly funded collections in the area and interacted with most of the local people involved in culture, museum curators, and development managers. Before the current project on the heritage of the First World War (see Acknowledgements), I was also involved in the national research project on Triglav National Park (2011-2014; seeBajuk Senčar 2013;Fikfak & Bajuk Senčar 2015;Hudales 2015;Kozorog & Poljak Istenič 2013), which gave me a good basis for further research on the heritage of the Isonzo Front (see…”