1971
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.3.5767.159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole in Acute Brucellosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tetracyclines are still the chemotherapeutic agents of choice in the treatment of brucellosis (Garrod et al, 1973) with the possible exception of co-trimoxazole (Hassan et al, 1971;Giunchi et al 1971). In this investigation we have found that the efficacy of the tetracyclines varies significantly in vitro.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Tetracyclines are still the chemotherapeutic agents of choice in the treatment of brucellosis (Garrod et al, 1973) with the possible exception of co-trimoxazole (Hassan et al, 1971;Giunchi et al 1971). In this investigation we have found that the efficacy of the tetracyclines varies significantly in vitro.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Co-trimoxazole has been used in the treatment of acute and chronic brucellosis (La1 et al, 1970; Giunchi, de Rosa and Fabiani, 1971 ;Hassan et al, 1971). The results in acute infections are encouraging, although further clinical trials are necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, brucellae are highly sensitive to the combination of trimethoprim with sulphamethoxazole (co-trimoxazole) and this drug has been found to be very effective clinically in Br. melitensis infection provided treatment is continued for six weeks (Hassan et al, 1971). It was felt that in this patient prolonged antimicrobial therapy was indicated to protect the prosthetic valve which had been inserted in the presence of uncontrolled infection and that co-trimoxazole would therefore be easier to administer than the more traditional combination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%