Mouse expanded simple tandem repeat (ESTR) loci are the most unstable loci in the mouse genome. Despite the fact that over the last decade these loci have been extensively used for studying germline mutation induction in mice, to date little is known about the mechanisms underlying spontaneous and induced ESTR mutation. Here we used flow cytometry and single-molecule PCR to compare the frequency of ESTR mutation in four flow-sorted fractions of the mouse male germ cells -spermatogonia, spermatocytes I, round and elongated spermatids. The frequency and the spectrum of ESTR mutation did not significantly differ between different stages of mouse spermatogenesis. Considering these data and the results of other publications, we propose that spontaneous ESTR mutation is mostly attributed to replication slippage in spermatogonia and these loci may be regarded as a class of expanded microsatellites.
IntroductionThe results of some recent publication show that mouse ESTR loci provide a sensitive technique for studying germline mutation induction following exposure to ionising radiation and chemical mutagens [1,2]. ESTR loci consist of long homogenous arrays of relatively short repeats (4-9 bp) and show a very high spontaneous mutation rate of length changes both in germline and somatic cells [3][4][5]. In this respect they clearly differ from another group of highly unstable tandem repeat DNA loci -the GC-rich human minisatellites, where the bulk of spontaneous mutations occur in the germline with very rare events taking place in the somatic cells [6]. Given this, ESTRs more closely resemble some microsatellite loci showing equally high instability in the germline and somatic tissues. In many publications it has been suggested, though not experimentally proven, that microsatellite mutation is most probably attributed to replication slippage [7]. However, numerous studies have also identified a unique class of the expanded disease-causing human microsatellites i.e., trinucleotide instability, which is clearly attributed to non-replication mechanisms [8]. It therefore remains unclear whether the very high spontaneous instability at ESTR loci is replication-driven or may be attributed to some other mechanisms. Here, to elucidate the still unknown mechanisms of ESTR spontaneous mutation, we have compared ESTR mutation frequencies in flow-sorted fractions of the male germ cells.
Materials and methods
Flow cytometryCBA/J male mice (Iffa Credo, Charles River, France) were used in this study. Cells were isolated from 3 month-old male mice using a two-step enzymatic digestion as previously described [9]. Magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) of α 6 -integrin positive cells was performed as we previously described [9] using rat anti-α 6 -integrin antibodies (GoH3, BD Biosciences) and mouse anti-rat Kappa antibody coupled to magnetic microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Paris, France). Testicular cell suspension, MACS α 6 -integrin-positive and negative cellular fractions were collected and suspended at 10 6 cells/ml for DNA stain...