Objectives
Utilitarian and recreational walking both contribute to physical
activity. Yet walking for these two purposes may be different behaviors. We
sought to provide operational definitions of utilitarian and recreational
walking and to objectively measure their behavioral, spatial, and temporal
differences in order to inform transportation and public health policies and
interventions.
Methods
Data were collected 2008–2009 from 651 Seattle-King County
residents, wearing an accelerometer and a GPS unit, and filling-in a travel
diary for 7 days. Walking activity bouts were classified as utilitarian or
recreational based on whether walking had a destination or not. Differences
between the two walking purposes were analyzed, adjusting for the nested
structure of walking activity within participants.
Results
Of the 4,905 observed walking bouts, 87.4% were utilitarian
and 12.6% recreational walking. Utilitarian walking bouts were
45% shorter in duration (−12.1 min) and 9% faster in
speed (+0.3km/h) than recreational walking bouts. Recreational walking
occurred more frequently in the home neighborhood and was not associated
with recreational land uses. Utilitarian walking occurred in areas having
higher residential, employment, and street density, lower residential
property value, higher area percentage of mixed-use neighborhood
destinations, lower percentage of parks/trails, and lower average
topographic slope than recreational walking.
Conclusion
Utilitarian and recreational walking are substantially different in
terms of frequency, speed, duration, location, and related built
environment. Policies that promote walking should adopt type-specific
strategies. The high occurrence of recreational walking near home highlights
the importance of the home neighborhood for this activity.