2014
DOI: 10.3141/2405-03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trip Purpose Identification from GPS Tracks

Abstract: Travel surveys are increasingly taking advantage of GPS data, which offer precise route and time observations and a potentially reduced response burden. In these surveys, travel diaries are usually constructed automatically where research on the employed procedures has been focused on mode identification. The goal of the research reported here was to improve trip purpose identification. The analysis used random forests, a machine-learning approach that had been successfully applied to mode identification. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
41
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach is different from that used by national survey tools, which rely on subjective self-reported trip purposes (e.g., the 2001 and 2009 NHTS) (Agrawal and Schimek, 2007; Yang and Diez-Roux, 2012). Previous studies proposed to classify trip purposes by using land use types at destination, which were identified by GPS data (Wolf et al, 2001) or machine learning approaches based on participants’ survey, accelerometer, and GPS data (Montini et al, 2014). However, these studies considered all trips, did not focus on walking, and required contextual land use data or intensive computational processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is different from that used by national survey tools, which rely on subjective self-reported trip purposes (e.g., the 2001 and 2009 NHTS) (Agrawal and Schimek, 2007; Yang and Diez-Roux, 2012). Previous studies proposed to classify trip purposes by using land use types at destination, which were identified by GPS data (Wolf et al, 2001) or machine learning approaches based on participants’ survey, accelerometer, and GPS data (Montini et al, 2014). However, these studies considered all trips, did not focus on walking, and required contextual land use data or intensive computational processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…activity start times, activity durations, land use information) (Gong et al 2014;Wolf, Guensler, and Bachman 2001;Lu, Zhu, and Zhang 2012;S. Lee and Hickman 2014;Shen and Stopher 2013;Montini et al 2014;Lu and Zhang 2015;Simas-Oliveira et al 2014;Lu, Zhu, and Zhang 2013;Feng and Timmermans 2015;Nurul Habib and Miller 2009). In the field of ITS (Intelligent Transportation Systems), transportation data mining methods that aim to integrate different data sources are generally denoted as data fusion (DF) techniques.…”
Section: Big Transport Data Mining Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 State of the art GPS tracking makes it possible to collect long-term travel diaries while placing a very low burden on respondents (Stopher et al (2008)). Initial studies using GPS loggers for travel diary collection were promising, although they required a substantial effort to distribute the devices and to obtain additional information from respondents necessary to interpret the GPS records (Bohte and Maat (2009); Oliveira et al (2011); Schuessler and Axhausen (2009); Montini et al (2014)). Today, the focus has shifted away from GPS loggers towards smartphone applications (Cottrill et al (2013)), due to their easier administration and the development of automatic methods for detecting transport mode based on GPS data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%