2012
DOI: 10.1002/cbic.201200434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

tRNA Processing by Protein‐Only versus RNA‐Based RNase P: Kinetic Analysis Reveals Mechanistic Differences

Abstract: In Arabidopsis thaliana, RNase P function, that is, endonucleolytic tRNA 5'-end maturation, is carried out by three homologous polypeptides ("proteinaceous RNase P" (PRORP) 1, 2 and 3). Here we present the first kinetic analysis of these enzymes. For PRORP1, a specificity constant (k(react)/K(m(sto))) of 3×10(6) M(-1) min(-1) was determined under single-turnover conditions. We demonstrate a fundamentally different sensitivity of PRORP enzymes to an Rp-phosphorothioate modification at the canonical cleavage sit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that the differentially localized PRORP isozymes are not selective for pretRNAs of different organellar origin. The STO cleavage rate constants among the PRORP isozymes are consistent with a previous study using a bacterial pre-tRNA Gly substrate, where the observed rate constants vary between 0.04 and 0.13 s −1 (Pavlova et al 2012). Despite these similarities, our data indicate that there is a subset of pre-tRNAs that are more efficiently processed by specific PRORP isozymes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This suggests that the differentially localized PRORP isozymes are not selective for pretRNAs of different organellar origin. The STO cleavage rate constants among the PRORP isozymes are consistent with a previous study using a bacterial pre-tRNA Gly substrate, where the observed rate constants vary between 0.04 and 0.13 s −1 (Pavlova et al 2012). Despite these similarities, our data indicate that there is a subset of pre-tRNAs that are more efficiently processed by specific PRORP isozymes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…4B). This proposed recognition mechanism is slightly distinct from that by bacterial RNase P. It was further described that an Rp-phosphothioate modification of the scissile bond has no influence on the cleavage activity by PRORP1, even though RNase P is highly sensitive to the modification [30]. It is therefore likely that PRORP1 catalyzes the pre-tRNA processing in a manner distinct from RNase P. It could thus be assumed that the proteinaceous RNase P, PRORP1, has evolved independently of the molecular mechanism by which RNA-based RNase P cleaves the pre-tRNA in catalysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Furthermore, the data suggest that one of the scissile phosphate oxygens of pre-tRNA interacts with bound metal ion(s). In PRORP, the pro-S p oxygen of pre-tRNA is hypothesized to interact with the active site metal ions (23,36), although this needs to be confirmed experimentally, whereas the pro-R p substrate oxygen coordinates a metal ion in RNA-based RNase P (37,38). Modeling of bound substrate suggests that coordination of the pro-S p or pro-R p oxygen affects the position of the metal ion relative to the scissile phosphate, leading to an alteration in the pre-tRNA binding mode.…”
Section: Ph Dependence Reveals a Single Ionization Important Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PRORP1 is activated by Mg 2ϩ , Mn 2ϩ , Co 2ϩ , and Ni 2ϩ (but not Ca 2ϩ , Zn 2ϩ , or Cd 2ϩ (7,23)). We measured the rate constant for single turnover cleavage (k max ) at pH 6.5 with saturating concentrations of PRORP1 and metal (Co ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%