“…After normalising economic damage data by considering societal change and economic development, no long‐term increasing trend was found for floods in Europe (Barredo, ; Paprotny et al, ), Spain (Barredo, Sauri, & Llasat, ) and the United States (Downton & Pielke Jr., ); for hurricanes in the United States (Klotzbach, Bowen, Pielke, & Bell, ; Pielke Jr. et al, ; Pielke Jr. & Landsea, ); for tropical cyclones in the United States (Schmidt, Kemfert, & Hoppe, ) and China (Fischer, Su, & Wen, ); for tornadoes in the United States (Simmons, Sutter, & Pielke, ); and for several processes at the global level (Neumayer & Barthel, ; Visser, Petersen, & Ligtvoet, ). Some studies indicated a trend over time (as in Gall, Borden, Emrich, & Cutter, ; Welker & Faust, ; Cinco et al, ), but Bouwer () and Neumayer and Barthel () argued that one needs to be careful when attributing such a trend to anthropogenic climate change because natural climate variability could provide an alternative explanation. Bouwer () analysed 22 disaster loss studies and found that, after normalisation for changes in population and wealth, climate change has had no significant impact on losses from natural disasters.…”