True, false, paranormal and ‘designated’?: a reply to Jenkins

Validity for Strong Pluralists

“…Thus, Tappolet believes Beall's approach likewise fails to avoid horn (b) of the trilemma as well. I have previously argued (with Caret [8]), that designation is not a kind of truth. And so I think Beall's proposal is amenable to the strong pluralist.…”

The importance of being designated: a comment on Caret and Cotnoir

“…Caret and Cotnoir (2008) take issue with my reply (Jenkins 2007) to Beall's suggestion (Beall 2006) that by thinking about a five‐valued logic we can show how, without courting contradiction, a language can contain the resources to categorize all its sentences as ‘true’, ‘false’ or ‘other’.…”