2014
DOI: 10.1002/sec.1026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trust dynamic task allocation algorithm with Nash equilibrium for heterogeneous wireless sensor network

Abstract: Task allocation is an important issue in wireless sensor networks (WSNs), and the existing traditional solutions to this problem in high‐performance computing cannot be directly implemented in WSNs because of limitations such as resource availability and shared communication medium. In this paper, we address the task allocation problem for a heterogeneous WSN, and a trust dynamic task allocation algorithm is proposed. Firstly, to ensure the nodes in the same coalition are mutually closer in distance, a discret… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, we see that LW-FGAC is the only scheme that simultaneously meets all the features given in the table. We refer the reader to [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44], to see more references related to attribute-based systems and wireless sensor networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, we see that LW-FGAC is the only scheme that simultaneously meets all the features given in the table. We refer the reader to [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44], to see more references related to attribute-based systems and wireless sensor networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In wireless communication networks, especially in heterogeneous sensor networks, the node energy is not static, and decreases gradually with time [18,19]. Therefore, if we randomly choose a fixed probability value to represent the roaming probability between nodes, it will undoubtedly deviate from the calculations of the network.…”
Section: Dynamic Node Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time complexity of Part 1 is Otrue(k×(true(2N+m+ntrue)×logN)true), where m is the number of obstacles and n denotes the number of edges that intersect with obstacles. The time complexity introduced by k can be significantly decreased by parallel skill (Guo, Chen, Chen, & Zheng, ). Delaunay triangulation of a simulated dataset S1 and the sub‐graphs rounded up by dotted colored borderlines are shown in Figure .…”
Section: The Adc+ Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%