2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84800-356-9_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trust Metrics in Recommender Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [37], Massa and Avesani discuss some of the weaknesses of collaborative filtering systems. For instance, users typically rate or experience only a small fraction of the available items, which makes the rating matrix very sparse (since a recommender system often deals with millions of items).…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [37], Massa and Avesani discuss some of the weaknesses of collaborative filtering systems. For instance, users typically rate or experience only a small fraction of the available items, which makes the rating matrix very sparse (since a recommender system often deals with millions of items).…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, unsurprisingly, some attempts in this direction have already been made, see for example [15,23,30,37,46,49,51]. Trust-enhanced recommender systems can roughly be divided into two classes, according to the way the trust values are obtained.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The recommender system is a subclass of information filtering system which can recommend services that a user would like. However, as the most popular recommendation mechanism, collaborative filtering (CF) suffers from the well-known data sparseness problem and the cold start problem [8][9][10][12][13]. The trust-aware recommender system (TARS) improves CF by suggesting the worthwhile information to the users on the basis of user trust: trust is the measure of willingness to believe in a user based on its competence and behavior within a specific context at a given time [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most researches [12][13][14][15][16][21][22][23][24][25] did not provide any information how they find the recommenders. A few other works [8][9][10] briefly mentioned that they search the entire trust network to find the recommenders: since it does not miss any node reachable by the trust propagations, the TARS can achieve high prediction coverage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%