2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2006.00827.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Truth hurts – hard lessons from Australia's largest mass casualty exercise with contaminated patients

Abstract: In response to the increasing threat of a mass casualty incident involving chemical, biological or radiological agents, and concern over the preparedness of our hospital system to cope with patients from such an incident, we conducted the largest hospital-based field exercise involving contaminated patients that has been held in Australia. In the present paper, we outline the background to, and methodology of, Exercise Supreme Truth, and the efforts made to increase its realism. We focus our discussion on thre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the aftermath of the Bhopal disaster there was no mass casualty emergency response system in place and local hospitals were soon overwhelmed with casualties [5]. Even with the UK’s current capability of implementing mass decontamination procedures at a safe distance from the Hot Zone it is still likely that many casualties will quickly leave the scene and self-present at hospitals largely in the following six hours [16]. This brings into question our assumption that ambulant casualties having performed their initial disrobe (averaging approximately 10 minutes, see Figure A8 in the Supplementary Material) will be queuing for the MD1 prior to its construction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the aftermath of the Bhopal disaster there was no mass casualty emergency response system in place and local hospitals were soon overwhelmed with casualties [5]. Even with the UK’s current capability of implementing mass decontamination procedures at a safe distance from the Hot Zone it is still likely that many casualties will quickly leave the scene and self-present at hospitals largely in the following six hours [16]. This brings into question our assumption that ambulant casualties having performed their initial disrobe (averaging approximately 10 minutes, see Figure A8 in the Supplementary Material) will be queuing for the MD1 prior to its construction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incidents involving mass decontamination may present further challenges for emergency responders since they involve crowds [8], which may be perceived by responders as a source of disorder and ‘panic’ during emergencies [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst the evidence above provides important insights into the way members of the public experience the decontamination process, it is taken from small-scale incidents (< 30 people), rather than incidents involving mass decontamination. Mass decontamination may present different challenges for members of the public and responders since it involves crowds (Edwards, Caldicott, Eliseo, & Pearce, 2006). Social psychological theories of crowd behaviour in emergencies and disasters may therefore provide important insights into factors which play a part in the successful management of incidents involving mass decontamination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mass decontamination requires large numbers of people to wait their turn in order to go through the decontamination process, and so orderly and cooperative behaviour from members of the public will be essential to facilitate the smooth-running of the process. Put differently, a disorderly public response could turn a major incident into a catastrophe, resulting in increased spread of any contaminant into the wider community (Edwards et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%