2016
DOI: 10.5216/rpt.v45i1.39979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trypanosoma cruzi VECTOR INFECTION RATE IS UNDERESTIMATED IN SOME LOCALITIES IN THE STATE OF BAHIA

Abstract: A Bahia foi o último estado brasileiro a ser declarado livre da transmissão da doença deChagas pelo Triatoma infestans em 2006. O programa designado para controle vetorial da transmissão da doença de Chagas está atualmente ativo, e os potenciais triatomíneos coletados por funcionários do Departamento da Saúde do Estado da Bahia são praticamente todos diagnosticados como negativos para Trypanosoma cruzi quando analisados pelo método parasitológico convencional direto. O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar se o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trypanosoma cruzi infections in triatomines based on parasite morphology after optical microscopy are underestimated [39]. Consequently, the risk of T. cruzi transmission should be higher than the entomological-parasitological routine surveillance suggests [40, 41]. For example, test-specific naïve indices of T. cruzi infection in triatomines varied from 17.8%, considering only optical microscopy results, to 41.5%, considering PCR results (23.1% positive by conventional PCR and 41.3–41.4% by qPCR) [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trypanosoma cruzi infections in triatomines based on parasite morphology after optical microscopy are underestimated [39]. Consequently, the risk of T. cruzi transmission should be higher than the entomological-parasitological routine surveillance suggests [40, 41]. For example, test-specific naïve indices of T. cruzi infection in triatomines varied from 17.8%, considering only optical microscopy results, to 41.5%, considering PCR results (23.1% positive by conventional PCR and 41.3–41.4% by qPCR) [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%