2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-4488(00)00215-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trypanosomosis in small ruminants maintained by low riverine tsetse population in central Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high prevalence of T. vivax corroborates other findings in domestic animals [25] as well as wild animals [20,26,27]. This may result from the level of pathogenicity of this trypanosome, which is generally low and better controlled by animals [28], and/or from the mechanical transmission, which has been reported in T. vivax, T. evansi and to a certain extent T. congolense [29] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The high prevalence of T. vivax corroborates other findings in domestic animals [25] as well as wild animals [20,26,27]. This may result from the level of pathogenicity of this trypanosome, which is generally low and better controlled by animals [28], and/or from the mechanical transmission, which has been reported in T. vivax, T. evansi and to a certain extent T. congolense [29] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The low prevalence of T. brucei parasites (3.2%) is consistent with previous surveys carried out on the Jos Plateau [12,38], across Nigeria in general [39,40] and elsewhere in Africa in cattle [41-43], and in sheep and goats [44]. The low prevalence in cattle may relate to the reported resistance of indigenous West African cattle to T. brucei infections [38].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Trypanosome prevalence in animals could be affected by several factors such as availability of reservoir hosts, seasonal factors, altitude, fly density and behavior, sensitivity of diagnostic technique, stage of infection, method of sampling, conflict and other human activities [ 11 , 17 , 38 ]. For instance, the microscopy techniques used by different authors varies, while wet mount, thin and thick smear was well-appreciated in the 1960s and 1970s [ 39 , 40 ], more sensitive methods such as buffy coat technique, haematocrit centrifugation technique, sub-inoculation and standard trypanosome detection method were used in the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s onwards [ 41 , 42 , 43 ]. There have been arguments on the prevalence of T. vivax in dry and early wet seasons in Nigeria, while T. congolense have been detected more in the wet season [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%