MARCKS-related protein (MRP) isT he proteins of the myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate (MARCKS) family are protein kinase C substrates that have been proposed to regulate the actin cytoskeleton (1). The family comprises two members: MARCKS itself is a ubiquitous 32-kDa protein, whereas MARCKS-related protein (MRP, also called MacMARCKS) is a 22-kDa protein expressed mainly in brain and reproductive tissues (2). MARCKS proteins share two conserved segments, namely the myristoylated N terminus and a central highly basic 24-to 25-residue-long segment, the effector domain, also called the ''phosphorylation site domain'' (1, 3). In vitro, MARCKS and MRP bind to calmodulin (CaM) with high affinity (K d Ϸ 5 nM) (4, 5). Although direct proof for an interaction between MARCKS proteins and CaM has so far not been obtained in cells, indirect evidence suggests that MARCKS proteins mediate crosstalk between the protein kinase C-and CaM-signal transduction pathways (for reviews, see refs. 6 and 7).Two segments in MARCKS proteins are of interest with respect to their interactions with CaM.(i) The Effector Domain. The structure of the effector domain of MARCKS proteins has been the subject of several reports. Fig. 1 shows the amino acid sequence of the effector domain of MRP. This segment is highly basic (12 residues of 24 are lysines or arginines), but it also contains most of the large hydrophobic residues present in the intact protein (four phenylalanines and two leucines of seven). Although sequence analysis has previously led to the conclusion that this segment forms an ␣-helix (1), circular dichroic studies with peptides (8) and proteins (5, 9) suggest an extended structure for this segment. In the absence of information on the tertiary structure of MARCKS proteins, three different topologies can be proposed for the effector domain. The effector domain could be completely buried in a hydrophobic core (model A), which is unlikely because of the high content of charged amino acid residues. The effector domain could be on the surface of MARCKS proteins and partially exposed to water (model B). This model fits the proposed amphipathic structure of the effector domain (basic͞hydrophobic residues). Finally, the effector domain could be completely exposed to water and either act as a hinge between the C-and N-terminal domains of MARCKS proteins (model C1) or form an exposed loop on the surface of the protein (model C2). The observation that MARCKS proteins are elongated molecules (5, 10) supports model C1. However, the presence of a proline at position 96 in the middle of the effector domain of MRP could potentially induce the formation of a kink or a turn (11), favoring model C2.(ii) The Myristoylated N Terminus. Covalent modification of proteins with lipids, such as myristoylation in the case of MARCKS proteins, allows the interactions of these proteins with membranes (12). Myristoylation could also mediate protein-protein interactions. However, most proteins modified with lipids interact with other proteins on the ...