1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80070-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tube decompression of the dilated colon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Colon perforation was found at laparotomy in only 2 patients (13%). Fourteen patients underwent subtotal colectomy with terminal ileostomy, while for 1 patient the surgical procedure consisted only in a decompressive cecostomy as described by Khoo et al [10]. The 14 surgical procedures characterized by a subtotal colectomy differed exclusively for the treatment of the distal rectosigmoid stump: in 6 patients the distal rectosigmoid stump was implanted subcutaneously in the lower extremity of the wound and matured as a mucous fistula and since it was not technically feasible in the other 6 patients, the distal rectosigmoid stump was left at the pelvic brim (Hartman procedure).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colon perforation was found at laparotomy in only 2 patients (13%). Fourteen patients underwent subtotal colectomy with terminal ileostomy, while for 1 patient the surgical procedure consisted only in a decompressive cecostomy as described by Khoo et al [10]. The 14 surgical procedures characterized by a subtotal colectomy differed exclusively for the treatment of the distal rectosigmoid stump: in 6 patients the distal rectosigmoid stump was implanted subcutaneously in the lower extremity of the wound and matured as a mucous fistula and since it was not technically feasible in the other 6 patients, the distal rectosigmoid stump was left at the pelvic brim (Hartman procedure).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is no firm evidence that decompression actually changes prognosis and outcome, it does have theoretical benefit and may facilitate the placement of a rectal catheter for permanent remnant drainage. 9 Surgical colonic decompression with ileostomy was performed in 3 patients with TM. In all patients, the postoperative period was severe, and the clinical condition deteriorated, which appeared in circulatory injury, septicemia, consumptive coagulopathy, and thrombocytopenia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, this particular type of technical approach merely represents an extension of the uncontroversial right hemicolectomy for right-sided lesions while taking advantage of better heal ing conditions of an anastomosis involving the ileum [19], where the apposition of collapsed, well-supplied with blood, supple and easily mobilizable intestinal segments, as it is definitely the case for the small bowel but also for the distal sigmoid colon, located beyond the obstructing tumor, adds to the anastomotic safety. The technical diffi culties that might, eventually, be offered by the manipula tion of a massively distended colon can be minimized by way of a simple deflating maneuver [25], A one-stage segmental colectomy would offer most of the aforementioned advantages without the inconve- nience of diarrhea, maintaining, as it does, the ileocecal valve with its corresponding function of promoting a suitable fluid and electrolytes resorption within the termi nal ileum. Nevertheless, such a technical modality on dis tended, fecal-loaded large bowel segments carries an un acceptable risk of poor anastomotic healing, leakage and sepsis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%