“…2D and 3D finite‐element method (FEM) as employed for radial and axial‐flux machines [1–4], although precise, are very time‐consuming and not suitable for the preliminary designs, while analytical approaches provide fast, flexible and relatively accurate calculations, introducing a powerful tool for the design procedure. The second technique may be divided into two categories: first, subdomain methods which are on the basis of Laplace's and Poisson's equations as used for surface‐mounted PM machines [5, 6], switched reluctance machine [7], and flux switching machine [8]; second, flux‐tube models or magnetic equivalent circuit (MEC) approaches as used for salient pole [9], flux‐switching [10], Vernier [11], and switched reluctance [12] machines as well as magnetic bearings [13]. The former, albeit powerful, is usually sophisticated and unable to effectively account for the materials such as magnetic saturation of the iron elements, and it has essential problems with many geometries.…”