Chengcheng Zhou and Zixiao Yang contributed equally to this study.Objective: Peritumoral oedema (PTO) is commonly observed on MRI in malignant brain tumours including brain metastasis (bMET) and glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). This study aimed to differentiate bMET from GBM by comparing the volume ratio of PTO to tumour lesion (R vol ).Methods: 56 patients with solitary bMET or GBM were enrolled, and MRI was analyzed by a semi-automatic methodology based on MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, MA). The PTO volume (V oedema ) was segmented for quantification using T 2 fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery images, while the tumour volume was quantified with enhanced T 1 images. The quantitative volume of the tumour, PTO and the ratio of PTO to tumour were interpreted using SPSS® (IBM Corp., New York, NY; formerly SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) by considering different locations and pathologies. Results: The tumour volumes of supratentorial GBM, supratentorial bMET (supra-bMET) and infratentorial bMET were 32.22 6 21.9, 18.45 6 17.28 and 11.40 6 5.63 ml, respectively. The corresponding V oedema were 44.08 6 25.84, 73.20 6 40.35 and 23.74 6 7.78 ml, respectively. The V oedema difference between supratentorial and infratentorial lesions is significant (p-value 5 0.002). SuprabMET has a smaller tumour volume (p-value 5 0.032), but a larger PTO (p-value 5 0.007). The ratio of V oedema to the tumour volume in bMET is statistically higher than that in GBM (p-value 5 0.015). The cut-off ratio for identifying bMET from GBM is 3.9, with a specificity and sensitivity of 90.0% and 68.8%, respectively. Conclusion: Segmentation is an efficient method to quantify irregular PTO. bMET possesses more extensive oedema with smaller tumour volume than does GBM. The R vol is a valuable index to distinguish bMET from GBM. Advances in knowledge: This study presents a new method for the quantitation of PTO to differentiate bMET from GBM.