1978
DOI: 10.1148/126.2.507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumor Cell Respiration Following Irradiation

Abstract: Oxygen consumption rates for mouse mastocytoma cells examined from 3 to 4 hours after x-irradiation with 250-2000 rads were consistently higher than controls. Cyclic fluctuations in oxygen consumption per cell were dose-dependent; peaks in consumption were generally greater in magnitude and occurred later in time with increasing dose. The cyclic response in consumption is probably due to cell synchronization effects, while the overall higher respiration rates of irradiated cells may reflect increased metabolic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those patients with persistent hypoxia had poorer outcomes, suggesting that patients with persistent tumor hypoxia might benefit from more intensive treatments (Zips et al , 2012; Lock et al , 2017, 2019). One possible explanation for tumor hypoxia is reduced perfusion, although other explanations could account for increased oxygenation (Good & Harrington, 2013) including changes in the oxygen consumption rate (Clement et al , 1978; Ashton et al , 2016; Gallez et al , 2017). Some tumors were found to have higher levels of perfusion at intermediate times in a course of radiation therapy, but in other cases perfusion remained unchanged for at least several weeks in both cervical and in head and neck cancers (Shibuya et al , 2011; Lock et al , 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those patients with persistent hypoxia had poorer outcomes, suggesting that patients with persistent tumor hypoxia might benefit from more intensive treatments (Zips et al , 2012; Lock et al , 2017, 2019). One possible explanation for tumor hypoxia is reduced perfusion, although other explanations could account for increased oxygenation (Good & Harrington, 2013) including changes in the oxygen consumption rate (Clement et al , 1978; Ashton et al , 2016; Gallez et al , 2017). Some tumors were found to have higher levels of perfusion at intermediate times in a course of radiation therapy, but in other cases perfusion remained unchanged for at least several weeks in both cervical and in head and neck cancers (Shibuya et al , 2011; Lock et al , 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%