2016
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts long‐term survival outcomes in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A secondary analysis of a randomized phase 3 clinical trial

Abstract: Tumor response to TPF may be a properly powerful prognosis predictor and help to develop individualized treatment strategies for patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. Cancer 2017;123:1643-1652. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, all the patients included in the present study received IC plus CCRT, and the radiotherapy modality was consistently IMRT. The rationale for the decreased CCD was based on the reduced tumor volume after IC, impaired medication adherence after intensive IC, increased survival outcomes by adding IC before CCRT and significant advances in RT delivery techniques (such as IMRT) . The cCR plus pCR rates have been reported to reach 90% after IC; therefore, the subsequent administration of less intensive chemotherapy during RT is feasible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, all the patients included in the present study received IC plus CCRT, and the radiotherapy modality was consistently IMRT. The rationale for the decreased CCD was based on the reduced tumor volume after IC, impaired medication adherence after intensive IC, increased survival outcomes by adding IC before CCRT and significant advances in RT delivery techniques (such as IMRT) . The cCR plus pCR rates have been reported to reach 90% after IC; therefore, the subsequent administration of less intensive chemotherapy during RT is feasible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, IC greatly reduced tumor volume burden. Clinical complete response (cCR) and partial response (cPR) were observed in 11.3% and 79.6% of patients, respectively . Second, patients may be less able to tolerate the subsequent highly intensive CCRT after 2‐4 cycles of IC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prognostic value of tumor response to IC for LFFS was demonstrated in the multivariate analysis. A secondary analysis of a randomized phase 3 clinical trial8 also revealed that the 3-year failure-free survival rates in the CR (88.5% vs 61.9%; P =0.017) and PR (81.2% vs 61.9%; P =0.01) groups were obviously higher than that of the SD group, and concluded that the tumor response to IC with a TPF regimen may be helpful in developing individualized treatment strategies for patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. In this context, we recommend our method of reduced GTV delineation for patients with local OR after IC, considering the high LFFS rate of 94.1%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has currently been widely accepted as an attractive approach in lieu of establishing concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) . CCRT is frequently accompanied by acute and late dose‐limiting toxicities, hindering its common use .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%