2020
DOI: 10.3390/ijms21134778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumors Resistant to Checkpoint Inhibitors Can Become Sensitive after Treatment with Vascular Disrupting Agents

Abstract: Immune therapy improves cancer outcomes, yet many patients do not respond. This pre-clinical study investigated whether vascular disrupting agents (VDAs) could convert an immune unresponsive tumor into a responder. CDF1 mice, with 200 mm3 C3H mammary carcinomas in the right rear foot, were intraperitoneally injected with combretastatin A-4 phosphate (CA4P), its A-1 analogue OXi4503, and/or checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD-1, PD-L1, or CTLA-4 antibodies), administered twice weekly for two weeks. Using the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned in the Introduction, effective treatment with VDAs will likely require combination therapy, specifically to overcome the peripheral surviving tumor tissue ring observed in most studies [ 11 , 41 , 56 , 258 ]. Imaging should be particularly effective in facilitating optimal combination based on timing and extent of acute vascular changes.…”
Section: Imaging Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned in the Introduction, effective treatment with VDAs will likely require combination therapy, specifically to overcome the peripheral surviving tumor tissue ring observed in most studies [ 11 , 41 , 56 , 258 ]. Imaging should be particularly effective in facilitating optimal combination based on timing and extent of acute vascular changes.…”
Section: Imaging Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the tumor center may necrose, the rim often repopulates rapidly. As such, several VDAs have been tested in combination with additional therapies [ 11 , 41 ], including radiotherapy [ 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 ], antiangiogenic agents (such as bevacizumab) [ 47 , 48 ], traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy (e.g., carboplatin, paclitaxel) [ 41 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 ] and recently immunotherapy [ 55 , 56 ]. There is a current resurgence of interest in VDAs and frequent reports describe novel agents, many based on the colchicine/combretastatin motif [ 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 ] ( Figure 2 A).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the tumor center may necrose, the rim often repopulates rapidly. As such, several VDAs have been tested in combination with additional therapies, including radiotherapy [ 22 , 23 ], antiangiogenic agents (such as bevacizumab) [ 24 ] and, recently, immunotherapy [ 25 ]. There is a current resurgence of interest in VDAs, and frequent reports describe novel agents, many based on the combretastatin motif [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ], including benzosuberenes [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allowing animals to breathe 60% oxygen rather than air (21%) was shown to decrease the levels of tumour hypoxia and immunosuppressive molecules, while also weakening immunosuppression of regulatory T-cells and increasing proinflammatory cytokines; these effects were associated with inhibition of tumour growth, decreased metastasis and prolonged animal survival [83]. In addition, treating tumours with vasculartargeting agents that effectively killed hypoxic cells could convert tumours that were unresponsive to checkpoint inhibitors into responders [87].…”
Section: Other Consequences Of Tumour Hypoxiamentioning
confidence: 99%